ArticleGeroScience2025
Differential proteomic profiles between cognitive frail and robust older adults from the MELoR cohort.
Article in GeroScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Large-scale genome-wide analyses with proteomics integration reveal novel loci and biological insights into frailty.Nature aging · 2025Pooled it
- A Preliminary Predictive Panel for Pre-Frailty Based on Serum Proteomic Biomarkers: A Two-Phase Cross-Sectional Study.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present study explored for the first time the blood-based proteomic signature that could potentially distinguish older adults with and without cognitive frailty (CF). The participants were recruited under the Malaysian Elders Longitudinal Research (MELoR) study. Cognition and physical frailty were determined using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Fried's criteria, respectively. The differential protein expression in the blood samples (38 CF vs 40 robust) were then determined using the Sequential Window Acquisition of All Theoretical Mass Spectra (SWATH) analysis. A total of 294 proteins were found to be differentially expressed in the CF group as opposed to the robust group. Considering proteins with fold change (FC) ≥ ± 2 and p-values < 0.05, 13 proteins were significantly upregulated and nine proteins significantly downregulated in the CF group when compared to the robust group. Subsequent correlation analysis identified nine dysregulated proteins, namely APOA1, APOA2, APOA4, APOC1, APOE, GPX3, RBP4, SERPINC1 and TTR, to exhibit significantly and moderately strong correlations with parameters of cognitive and/or frailty assessments. These proteins could potentially serve as useful proteomic signature of CF given their sensitivity > 78%, specificity > 75%, accuracy > 80% and area under the curve (AUC) > 0.8. The major biological pathways that could be potentially dysregulated by the nine proteins were associated with lipid metabolism and the retinoid system. The present findings warrant further validation in future studies that involve a larger cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.