ReviewReviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders2025
Nutritional status and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: lights and shadows with a clinical guide from the NIKE Group.
Review in Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The impact of potential food allergen exposure on wound healing after malignant tumor surgery: immune tolerance alterations and clinical risk assessment.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Parathyromatosis: The Pathogenic Background (Post-Parathyroidectomy Seeding or Exceptional Embryologic Remnant) and the Importance of a Fine Clinical Index for Recurrent Primary Hyperparathyroidism (a Narrative Review).Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Fragility fractures in well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Results from a multicentered retrospective study.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2025Article
- Incretins and SGLT-2 inhibitors in diabetic patients with neuroendocrine tumors: current updates and future directions.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) originating in the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tract are rare tumors often associated with significant metabolic disturbances and nutritional challenges. This review explores the intricate relationship between nutritional status and the development, progression, and prognosis of GEP-NENs. Through an extensive literature search encompassing studies up to April 2024, we examined various factors, including obesity, malnutrition, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus, and their roles in the development and progression of GEP-NENs. The review highlights the dual role of obesity, both as a risk factor and a potential prognostic indicator, drawing attention to the 'obesity paradox' observed in cancer research. Additionally, we discuss the impact of malnutrition on patient outcomes and emphasize the need for comprehensive nutritional assessments beyond BMI. This analysis highlights the importance of incorporating nutritional interventions into preventive and therapeutic strategies for GEP-NEN patients. Future research should further clarify these associations and develop personalized nutritional management protocols to improve patient prognosis and quality of life. Acronyms adopted in the text and tables: AOR: adjusted odd ratio, BIA: Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis, BMI: Body Mass Index, CI: confidence interval, CLARINET: Controlled Study of Lanreotide Antiproliferative Response in Neuroendocrine Tumor, FLI: fatty liver index, GEP: gastroenteropancreatic, GLIM: global leadership into malnutrition, HR: hazard ratio, MS: metabolic syndrome, MUST: malabsorption universal screening tool, NEC: neuroendocrine carcinoma, NENs: Neuroendocrine neoplasms, NETs: Neuroendocrine tumors, NRS: Nutritional Risk Screening, OR: odd ratio, OS: overall survival, PFS: progression-free survival, RR: risk ratio, SGA: Subjective Global Assessment, T2DM: type 2 diabetes mellitus, VAI: visceral adiposity index, WD: well-differentiated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39653986What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.