ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Assessing real-world safety of plecanatide: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world safety assessment of ublituximab: a pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Real-world safety of maribavir: a retrospective study based on signal detection in the FDA adverse event reporting system.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Adverse drug events associated with insulin glargine: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Safety assessment of Osilodrostat: The adverse event analysis based on FAERS database by means of disproportionality analysis.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Plecanatide is a selective gastrointestinal peptide used for the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C). Given its widespread use, understanding the long-term safety of plecanatide in real-world settings is essential. Methods: Data for this study were sourced from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from the first quarter of 2017 to the second quarter of 2024. Disproportionality analysis methods were employed to quantify adverse event signals associated with plecanatide. Additionally, a Weibull distribution analysis was conducted to assess changes in adverse events over time. Sensitivity analyses were performed to enhance the robustness of the findings. Results: A total of 861 cases associated with plecanatide were identified, including 2057 adverse event reports. Common positive adverse events included diarrhea, constipation, abdominal distension, dissatisfaction with treatment, rectal tenesmus, increased fecal volume, abnormal gastrointestinal sounds, and gastrointestinal motility disorders. The majority of adverse events related to plecanatide occurred within the first 7 days of treatment. Findings were consistent across sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: This study preliminarily explores the safety of plecanatide in real-world applications, revealing significant new adverse event signals. These findings provide important safety references for clinicians prescribing plecanatide for CIC and IBS-C.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.