Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39654656›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2024

A Randomized Controlled Study of Efficacy and Cognitive Function Improvement of Vortioxetine and Escitalopram in Patients with Depression in Chinese Han Nationality.

Xinyi Ye, Pengfeng Xu, Jianping Jiao, Haoyang Zhao, Kangyu Jin, Shiyi Zhang, Fen Pan, Jingkai Chen, Hao Jiang, Jianbo Hu and 1 more

Abstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xinyi Ye *Department of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310003, People's Republic of China.
Pengfeng Xu *Department of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310003, People's Republic of China.
Jianping JiaoDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310003, People's Republic of China.
Haoyang ZhaoDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310003, People's Republic of China.
Kangyu JinDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310003, People's Republic of China.
Shiyi ZhangDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310003, People's Republic of China.
Fen PanDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310003, People's Republic of China.
Jingkai ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310003, People's Republic of China.
Hao JiangDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310003, People's Republic of China.
Jianbo HuDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310003, People's Republic of China.
Manli HuangDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310003, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of Vortioxetine and Escitalopram in improving cognition in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Methods: At baseline, 131 MDD patients and 70 healthy controls completed the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) and MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). Patients with MDD were randomly divided into Vortioxetine (n = 62) and Escitalopram (n = 69) groups with an 8-week follow-up research. ANOVA for repeated measurement was utilized to compare the efficacy of Vortioxetine and Escitalopram. Results: The total scores of HAMD-17, HAMA and SHAPS scales had statistical difference between MDD cases and healthy controls (P < 0.001) at baseline. After 8 weeks of treatment, the scale scores of the HAMD-17, HAMA and SHAPS had lowered in both groups, with no statistical difference between two groups (P > 0.05). At baseline, MDD patients had defects in Speed of Processing, Attention Vigilance, Verbal Learning, Visual Learning, Reasoning and Problem Solving, and Social Cognition, compared with healthy controls. After 8 weeks of treatment with Vortioxetine or Escitalopram, the patients had improved in the aspects of cognitive functions above except Social Cognition. Numerical improvements of MCCB scale were found in the two groups, P > 0.05. Most adverse events were mild or moderate, with nausea being the most common adverse event. Conclusion: Both Vortioxetine and Escitalopram can improve the mental status and cognitive functions in MDD patients, with mild or moderate adverse events. Trial Registration: www.chictr.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR1900024858.

Indexed as

efficacyescitaloprammajor depressive disorderrandomized controlled trialvortioxetine

Identifiers

PMID39654656
PMCPMC11626980

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.