SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Safety and efficacy of outpatient intravenous diuresis in decompensated heart failure: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating the BAN-ADHF diuretic resistance score into same day emergency care centres for heart failure management: a conceptual framework.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Decongestion in chronic heart failure.JRSM cardiovascular diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Heart failure (HF) burdens the US healthcare system, with annual costs exceeding $30 billion. Outpatient intravenous (OP IV) diuresis in clinic or home settings may potentially improve outcomes and reduce costs, though limited data exists. This systematic review evaluates the safety, efficacy, and outcomes of OP IV diuresis in managing decompensated HF as a hospitalization alternative. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, this systematic review used MeSH terms in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CINAHL Complete, and Cochrane Central. From 16 selected studies, 15 were single-center; 6 prospective, 9 retrospective; and 1 was a randomized trial comparing OP IV diuresis to oral home regimen. Demographics, visit data, and outcomes were collected, and 30-day outcomes were compared to inpatient IV (IP IV) diuresis from 2021 Medicare HF hospitalizations. Results: The review included 1,590 unique patients treated with OP IV diuretics, with a mean age of 70 ± 6 years, 69.7% male, and 74.8% NYHA III-IV. Minimal adverse post-diuresis events such as hypokalemia, hypotension, and worsening renal function occurred (4.5%, 0.7%, and 2.3% respectively). Post-visit mean weight loss was -2.2 ± 1.1 kg. The 30-day readmission rate for OP IV diuresis was significantly lower than IP IV diuresis (20.0% vs. 22.6%; Discussion: OP IV diuresis is a safe and effective treatment for decompensated HF with minimal risk of adverse events. Data demonstrate reduced 30-day readmission, mortality rates, cost. These findings highlight the potential of OP IV diuresis as an enhanced alternative HF care; however, further randomized control trials are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.