ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Ergonomic challenges in healthcare: mapping physical load during patient transfers using electromyographic field measurements.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are prevalent among healthcare workers. These workers experience high rates of low-back pain; partly due to the high physical demands of patient transfers. Understanding the specific transfer scenarios that contribute to high physical loads is therefore crucial for developing strategies to improve working conditions. Methods: This study utilized electromyography to measure muscle activity in the erector spinae muscles during patient transfers, performing measurements in real-life hospital settings to identify the physical load associated with different transfer scenarios. Using linear mixed models, the 95th percentile ranks of the normalized root mean square (nRMS) values were analyzed for a range of different patient transfers. Results: The results revealed significant differences in physical load across various patient transfer scenarios. High-load activities included sitting to lying down or lying down to sitting (nRMS 32.7, 95% CI: 28.9-36.6) and lifting the upper body (32.4, 95% CI: 28.8-35.9), while low-load activities such as supporting patients while walking or standing (21.9, 95% CI: 18.6-25.1) and mobilizing in bed (19.9, 95% CI: 16.1-23.8) required less muscle activation. Moderate-load activities included bed to chair transfers (28.1, 95% CI: 24.9-31.3) and lifting the head (26.3, 95% CI: 22.7-29.9). Conclusion: Understanding the physical load associated with different patient transfer scenarios allows for better organization of work in healthcare settings. These novel findings emphasize the need for effective task allocation, rotational schedules, and the use of assistive devices to distribute physical load and reduce injury risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.