ReviewWorld journal of critical care medicine2024
Navigating gastrointestinal endoscopy challenges in the intensive care unit: A mini review.
Review in World journal of critical care medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) may need bedside endoscopy for gastrointestinal (GI) emergencies. Conducting endoscopy in the ICU for critically ill patients needs special consideration. This mini review focuses on indications for bedside endoscopes, including GI bleeding, volvulus, and bowel obstruction. It explains the risks associated with urgent endoscopies in critical patients and outcomes. Hemodynamic instability, coagulopathy, and impaired mucosal visualization are important considerations before bedside endoscopy. It also discusses the anesthesia considerations for non-operating room anesthesia. Multidisciplinary collaboration, meticulous patient selection, and procedural optimization help mitigate risks and maximize procedural success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.