Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39655315›Full record

ArticleNature and science of sleep2024

Resting-State EEG Microstates Dynamics Associated with Interindividual Vulnerability to Sleep Deprivation.

Zehui Liu, Tian Xie, Ning Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zehui LiuPhilosophy and Social Science Laboratory of Reading and Development in Children and Adolescents (South China Normal University), Ministry of Education; Center for Sleep Research, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health & Cognitive Science, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, People's Republic of China.
Tian XiePhilosophy and Social Science Laboratory of Reading and Development in Children and Adolescents (South China Normal University), Ministry of Education; Center for Sleep Research, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health & Cognitive Science, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, People's Republic of China.
Ning MaPhilosophy and Social Science Laboratory of Reading and Development in Children and Adolescents (South China Normal University), Ministry of Education; Center for Sleep Research, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health & Cognitive Science, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-8225-2847

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Sleep deprivation can induce severe deficits in vigilant maintenance and alternation in large-scale networks. However, differences in the dynamic brain networks after sleep deprivation across individuals have rarely been investigated. In the present study, we used EEG microstate analysis to investigate the effects of sleep deprivation and how it differentially affects resting-state brain activity in different individuals. Participants and Methods: A total of 44 healthy adults participated in a within-participant design study involving baseline sleep and 24-hour sleep deprivation, with resting-state EEG recorded during wakefulness. The psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) was used to measure vigilant attention. Participants were median split as vulnerable or resilient according to their changes in the number of lapses between the baseline sleep and sleep deprivation conditions. Results: Sleep deprivation caused decreases in microstates A, B, and D, and increases in microstate C. We also found increased transition probabilities of microstates C and D between each other, lower transition probabilities from microstates C and D to microstate B, and higher transition probabilities from microstates A and B to microstate C. Sleep-deprived vulnerable individuals showed decreased occurrence of microstate B and transition probability from microstate C to B after sleep deprivation, but not in resilient individuals. Conclusion: The findings suggest that sleep deprivation critically affects dynamic brain-state properties and the differences in time parameters of microstates might be the underlying neural basis of interindividual vulnerability to sleep deprivation.

Indexed as

electroencephalographyinterindividual differencesmicrostatesresting-statesleep deprivationvigilance

Identifiers

PMID39655315
PMCPMC11626958

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.