ArticleNanoscale2025
Plasma-assisted destruction of polystyrene nanoplastics.
Article in Nanoscale, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Polystyrene nanoplastics as PFAS carriers and their interactions with zwitterionic phospholipid membranes.Nanoscale advances · 2026Article
- Current Approaches and Challenges in Advanced Oxidation Processes for Nanoplastic Degradation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study addresses the critical need for the effective removal of nanoplastics (1 nm to 1000 nm), which pose a significant environmental challenge due to their ease of entry into biological systems and poorly understood health impacts. We report our investigation of a plasma-assisted methodology with a falling film plasma reactor to destroy and remove 200 nm polystyrene nanoplastic particles from their aqueous solution. Using the nanoparticle tracking analysis, size exclusion chromatography, and total organic carbon (TOC) analysis, we examined the degradation kinetics of the nanoplastics upon plasma-assisted treatment. A nanoplastic removal rate of 98.4% by particle count was achieved in one hour of treatment. This rate increased to 99.3% after three hours of treatment, along with a 27.4% reduction in the TOC of the solution. The chromatography results indicate that the observed elimination of nanoplastic contaminants was likely through the production of short polystyrene oligomers with molecular weights roughly equivalent to those of two styrene units. The superior efficacy of the plasma-assisted methodology over traditional ozonation to destroy nanoplastics was also illustrated. Our results not only elucidate a hypothesized polystyrene radical decay mechanism but also demonstrate a potential and complementary approach for mitigating nanoplastic pollution in water purification strategies.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.