ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
Quantifying the Corneal Nerve Whorl Pattern.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robust registration under large image misalignment using an iterative step-aware transformer with application to corneal confocal microscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Review
- Quantifying the Corneal Nerve Whorl Pattern.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: The corneal nerves within the sub-basal nerve plexus (SBNP) display a distinctive whorl-like pattern, a highly dynamic structure that could be a marker of diseases. Previous studies have reported a decrease in whorl nerve density in patients with diabetes, indicating an avenue for noninvasive monitoring of diabetic neuropathy. However, conflicting results have since been reported, highlighting the need for improved quantitative analysis of the corneal whorl. We present an automated algorithm to characterize the whorl shape and test the hypothesis that the whorl organization is affected by diabetic neuropathy. Methods: The SBNP whorl was analyzed as a vector field, from which seven whorl metrics were calculated. The efficacy of these whorl metrics was demonstrated in synthetic images, ex vivo mouse corneas, and in a publicly available dataset of wide-field in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) images of diabetic and control subjects. Linear discriminant analysis and the Peacock test were used to test for statistical differences. Our analysis code is made freely available. Results: Using our whorl metrics, we were able to quantify different whorl patterns in our patient population and statistically compare cohorts. We determined that whorl patterns tend to present bilaterally in patients (P < 0.001), but there were no significant differences between whorl patterns in patients with diabetes and control subjects, nor between patients with or without neuropathy symptoms. Conclusions: We present a generalizable framework to statistically compare corneal nerve patterns in cohorts of patients. Translational Relevance: SBNP whorl patterns could serve as a noninvasive marker for ocular diseases, whereas few quantitative IVCM endpoints have been identified to date.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.