Evidence mapPaperPMID 39656164Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024

Quantifying the Corneal Nerve Whorl Pattern.

Maryse Lapierre-Landry, Eric Y Lu, Matthew T McPheeters, Made Airanthi K Widjaja-Adhi, David L Wilson, Rony R Sayegh, Patricia R Taylor, Marcin Golczak, Michael W Jenkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Quantifying the Corneal Nerve Whorl Pattern.Translational vision science & technology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maryse Lapierre-LandryDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Eric Y LuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Matthew T McPheetersDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Made Airanthi K Widjaja-AdhiDepartment of Pharmacology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
David L WilsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Rony R SayeghCole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Patricia R TaylorDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Marcin GolczakDepartment of Pharmacology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Michael W JenkinsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

The Specialized Animal Resources CoreP30EY011373 · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · 1997 to 2025
$3.9M
Understanding neural control of the ocular surfaceU01EY034693 · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · 2025 to 2025
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY011373NEI NIH HHS U01 EY034693NIH HHS S10 OD024996NINDS NIH HHS UG3 NS131785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The corneal nerves within the sub-basal nerve plexus (SBNP) display a distinctive whorl-like pattern, a highly dynamic structure that could be a marker of diseases. Previous studies have reported a decrease in whorl nerve density in patients with diabetes, indicating an avenue for noninvasive monitoring of diabetic neuropathy. However, conflicting results have since been reported, highlighting the need for improved quantitative analysis of the corneal whorl. We present an automated algorithm to characterize the whorl shape and test the hypothesis that the whorl organization is affected by diabetic neuropathy. Methods: The SBNP whorl was analyzed as a vector field, from which seven whorl metrics were calculated. The efficacy of these whorl metrics was demonstrated in synthetic images, ex vivo mouse corneas, and in a publicly available dataset of wide-field in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) images of diabetic and control subjects. Linear discriminant analysis and the Peacock test were used to test for statistical differences. Our analysis code is made freely available. Results: Using our whorl metrics, we were able to quantify different whorl patterns in our patient population and statistically compare cohorts. We determined that whorl patterns tend to present bilaterally in patients (P < 0.001), but there were no significant differences between whorl patterns in patients with diabetes and control subjects, nor between patients with or without neuropathy symptoms. Conclusions: We present a generalizable framework to statistically compare corneal nerve patterns in cohorts of patients. Translational Relevance: SBNP whorl patterns could serve as a noninvasive marker for ocular diseases, whereas few quantitative IVCM endpoints have been identified to date.

Indexed as

CorneaDiabetic NeuropathiesMicroscopy, ConfocalAlgorithmsAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNerve Fibers

Identifiers

PMID39656164
PMCPMC11636656

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.