ArticleNeuroradiology2025
End-to-end deep learning patient level classification of affected territory of ischemic stroke patients in DW-MRI.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based cognitive impairment brain imaging analysis: New methods, new technologies, and new paradigms.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop an end-to-end DL model for automated classification of affected territory in DWI of stroke patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective multicenter study, brain DWI studies from January 2017 to April 2020 from Center 1, from June 2020 to December 2020 from Center 2, and from November 2019 to April 2020 from Center 3 were included. Four radiologists labeled images into five classes: anterior cerebral artery (ACA), middle cerebral artery (MCA), posterior circulation (PC), and watershed (WS) regions, as well as normal images. Additionally, for Center 1, clinical information was encoded as a domain knowledge vector to incorporate into image embeddings. 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) and attention gate integrated versions for direct 3D encoding, long short-term memory (LSTM-CNN), and time-distributed layer for slice-based encoding were employed. Balanced classification accuracy, macro averaged f1 score, AUC, and interrater Cohen's kappa were calculated.
resultsOverall, 624 DWI MRIs from 3 centers were utilized (mean age, interval: 66.89 years, 29-95 years; 345 male) with 439 patients in the training, 103 in the validation, and 82 in the test sets. The best model was a slice-based parallel encoding model with 0.88 balanced accuracy, 0.80 macro-f1 score, and an AUC of 0.98. Clinical domain knowledge integration improved the performance with 0.93 best overall accuracy with parallel stream model embeddings and support vector machine classifiers. The mean kappa value for interrater agreement was 0.87.
conclusionDeveloped end-to-end deep learning models performed well in classifying affected regions from stroke in DWI. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The end-to-end deep learning model with a parallel stream encoding strategy for classifying stroke regions in DWI has performed comparably with radiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39656236What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.