ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2025
Effectiveness and Safety Profile of Urethral Bulking with Bulkamid
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydrogel-Based Therapies for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: From Bulking Agents to Regenerative Platforms-A Narrative Review.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- Evaluating Global Online Search Trends for Urinary Incontinence Treatment Modalities: Insights from Google Trends.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Failure Rate, Time to Failure, and Associated Risk Factors: Polyacrylamide Hydrogel Injection for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in a Large Cohort.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Intraurethral cross-linked hyaluronic acid/dextranomer (DEXSUI®) injection versus mid-urethral sling for stress urinary incontinence: a comparative short-term outcome analysis.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Article
- Effectiveness and safety of polyacrylamide hydrogel injection for female stress urinary incontinence: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisVarious treatment options are currently available for the management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). This study was aimed at determining the effectiveness and safety profile of Bulkamid
methodsThis retrospective study conducted in two French urogynecology university centers between September 2019 and December 2023 included all patients with urinary incontinence who received Bulkamid
resultsAmong the 320 patients included (median age 58.2 years), the median follow-up was 24 months. Urethral hypermobility was found in 93.4% of patients (n = 282) and 92% (n = 275) had a positive cough test. At 1 month, 68.7% of patients (n = 220) achieved clinical success, 25.6% (n = 82) improved, and 5.6% (n = 18) reported failure. At last follow-up, 63.7% of patients (n = 204) were still cured, 21.9% (n = 70) had improved, and 14.4% (n = 46) reported failure. Among the 16 patients with overactive bladder (OAB) 43.7% had a Patient Global Improvement (PGI) score of 1-2 at 1 month and 50.0% at last follow-up, with significant difference compared with patients without OAB, 81.0% had a PGI score of 1-2 at 1 month and 74.8% at last follow-up (p = 0.0006 and p = 0.04 respectively). Regarding complications, acute urinary retention occurred in 3.1% of patients (n = 10), urinary infections in 2.2% (n = 7), and transient hematuria in 7.2% (n = 23). In multivariate analysis, follow-up time was significantly associated with failure compared with improvement/cure (OR = 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08, p = 0.0002).
conclusionThe present large series of patients reported the effectiveness of Bulkamid
Indexed as
Identifiers
39656238What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.