ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2024
Comparative analysis of suture-based and Hem-O-lok closure techniques in laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a retrospective propensity score matching study.
Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- COVID-19-specific risk factor for early post-appendectomy complications (EPAC) in older patients: a retrospective study.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Observational
- Risk factors of abdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy.BMC surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal method for appendix stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) remains debated. This study aims to evaluate the impact of suture-based closure and Hem-O-lok techniques on postoperative complications following LA for uncomplicated appendicitis.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with uncomplicated appendicitis treated by LA from January 2019 to December 2021. These patients were categorized into two groups: the suture-based closure group (223 cases) and the Hem-O-lok group (272 cases). Propensity score matching addressed potential discrepancies between the groups. Intraoperative and postoperative parameters of both groups were then compared.
resultsPost-matching, the operative duration in the suture-based group was longer than in the Hem-O-lok group (45.9 ± 9.7 min versus 42.8 ± 8.9 min, P = 0.001). The incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal abscesses and fluid collections was significantly lower in the suture-based closure group (P = 0.032). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the Hem-O-lok clamp technique [odds ratio (OR) = 5.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-64.25, P = 0.047] was a notable risk factor for intra-abdominal abscesses and fluid collections.
conclusionsThe suture-based closure technique significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal abscesses and fluid collections compared with the Hem-O-lok technique in patients undergoing LA for uncomplicated appendicitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39656266What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.