Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39656291›Full record

ArticleChromosoma2024

Genome location, evolution and centromeric contribution of satellite DNAs shared between the two closely related species Drosophila serido and D. antonietae (repleta group, buzzatii cluster).

Ana Mattioli Laborne, Dora Yovana Barrios-Leal, John S Heslop-Harrison, Maura Helena Manfrin, Gustavo C S Kuhn

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosoma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Satellite DNAs in Drosophila koepferae (repleta group) reveal patterns of origin, chromosomal organization, transcription, and turnover in the buzzatii cluster.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ana Mattioli LaborneDepartamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Dora Yovana Barrios-LealDepartamento de Genética, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
John S Heslop-HarrisonDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, Institute for Environmental Futures, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Maura Helena ManfrinDepartamento de Genética, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Gustavo C S KuhnDepartamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. gcskuhn@ufmg.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8183-5584

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) 308926/2021-8Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) 88882.317598/2019-01Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) 88887.622625/2021-00Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) APQ-00009-22Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) 2019/21781-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Satellite DNAs are highly repetitive, tandemly arranged sequences, typically making up large portions (> 20%) of the eukaryotic genome. Most satDNAs are fast evolving and changes in their abundance and nucleotide composition may be related to genetic incompatibilities between species. Here, we used Illumina paired-end sequencing raw data and graph-based read-clustering with the TAREAN bioinformatic tool to study the satDNAs in two cactophilic neotropical cryptic species of Drosophila from the buzzatii cluster (repleta group), D. serido and D. antonietae, from five localities in Brazil. Both species share the same four families of satDNAs: pBuM, DBC-150, CDSTR138 and CDSTR230. They represent less than 4% of the genomic DNA and there are no large differences in the abundance of each satDNA between species. Despite not being the most abundant satDNA, CDSTR138 was found to be associated with most centromeres. All four satDNAs showed instances where repeats are more homogeneous within than between species, a phenomenon known as concerted evolution. On the other hand, there was no evidence for concerted evolution at the population level. Thus, these satDNAs may also be useful as potential markers for species identification. The low levels of satDNA differentiation (both quantitatively as qualitatively) between the two species might be among the reasons that allowed the establishment of a hybrid zone between the two species in the southern coast of Brazil.

Indexed as

CentromereDNA, SatelliteDrosophilaEvolution, MolecularAnimalsBrazilGenome, InsectPhylogenySpecies SpecificityDNA, SatelliteCentromeresConcerted evolutionRepetitive DNAsSpeciation

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.