ArticleChromosoma2024
Genome location, evolution and centromeric contribution of satellite DNAs shared between the two closely related species Drosophila serido and D. antonietae (repleta group, buzzatii cluster).
Article in Chromosoma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Satellite DNAs in Drosophila koepferae (repleta group) reveal patterns of origin, chromosomal organization, transcription, and turnover in the buzzatii cluster.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Unraveling the role of satellite DNAs in the evolution of the giant XY sex chromosomes of the flea beetle Omophoita octoguttata (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae).BMC biology · 2025Article
- Sequenced genomes and chromosome mapping illuminate key aspects of satellite DNA biology in Drosophila gouveai and D. borborema (buzzatii cluster, repleta group).Genetics and molecular biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Satellite DNAs are highly repetitive, tandemly arranged sequences, typically making up large portions (> 20%) of the eukaryotic genome. Most satDNAs are fast evolving and changes in their abundance and nucleotide composition may be related to genetic incompatibilities between species. Here, we used Illumina paired-end sequencing raw data and graph-based read-clustering with the TAREAN bioinformatic tool to study the satDNAs in two cactophilic neotropical cryptic species of Drosophila from the buzzatii cluster (repleta group), D. serido and D. antonietae, from five localities in Brazil. Both species share the same four families of satDNAs: pBuM, DBC-150, CDSTR138 and CDSTR230. They represent less than 4% of the genomic DNA and there are no large differences in the abundance of each satDNA between species. Despite not being the most abundant satDNA, CDSTR138 was found to be associated with most centromeres. All four satDNAs showed instances where repeats are more homogeneous within than between species, a phenomenon known as concerted evolution. On the other hand, there was no evidence for concerted evolution at the population level. Thus, these satDNAs may also be useful as potential markers for species identification. The low levels of satDNA differentiation (both quantitatively as qualitatively) between the two species might be among the reasons that allowed the establishment of a hybrid zone between the two species in the southern coast of Brazil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39656291What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.