ArticleBiometrics2024
Estimating marginal treatment effect in cluster randomized trials with multi-level missing outcomes.
Article in Biometrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Handling Missing Outcome Data in Cluster Randomized Trials With Both Individual- and Cluster-Level Dropout.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Analyses of cluster randomized trials (CRTs) can be complicated by informative missing outcome data. Methods such as inverse probability weighted generalized estimating equations have been proposed to account for informative missingness by weighing the observed individual outcome data in each cluster. These existing methods have focused on settings where missingness occurs at the individual level and each cluster has partially or fully observed individual outcomes. In the presence of missing clusters, for example, all outcomes from a cluster are missing due to drop-out of the cluster, these approaches ignore this cluster-level missingness and can lead to biased inference if the cluster-level missingness is informative. Informative missingness at multiple levels can also occur in CRTs with a multi-level structure where study participants are nested in subclusters such as healthcare providers, and the subclusters are nested in clusters such as clinics. In this paper, we propose new estimators for estimating the marginal treatment effect in CRTs accounting for missing outcome data at multiple levels based on weighted generalized estimating equations. We show that the proposed multi-level multiply robust estimator is consistent and asymptotically normally distributed provided that one of the multiple propensity score models postulated at each clustering level is correctly specified. We evaluate the performance of the proposed method through extensive simulations and illustrate its use with a CRT evaluating a Malaria risk-reduction intervention in rural Madagascar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.