ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Comprehensive bioinformatics and machine learning analyses for breast cancer staging using TCGA dataset.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- EIF3H Modulates Glycolysis Through LDHA Stabilization in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2026Article
- The role of artificial intelligence in precision medicine for breast cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Identification of replication factor C subunit 4 as a potential therapeutic target in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on bioinformatic analysis and machine learning.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Integrating circulating microRNAs with epidemiological factors enhances breast cancer detection across subtypes: the MCC-Spain study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for postoperative radiotherapy decision-making in ypN0 breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a real-world study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Radiomics and Deep Learning: Bridging Breast Cancer Imaging Phenotypes and Genomic Heterogeneity.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Review
- Diagnostic and prognostic values of differentially expressed genes in canine mammary carcinoma: An integrated bioinformatics analysis.PloS one · 2026Article
- LINC00460 drives clear cell renal cell carcinoma progression via complement/coagulation and p53 pathways: a potential therapeutic target.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Identification of candidate biomarkers for NAFLD through bioinformatics analysis and machine learning based on circulating insulin degradation-associated genes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Systems biology analysis of long non-coding RNAs and targets to identify key modules and biomarkers in breast cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Prognostic Significance ofBiology · 2025Article
- Downregulated MYL1 Emerges as a Promising Diagnostic Biomarker for Rheumatoid Arthritis.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- EXO1 overexpression induces homologous recombination deficiency and enhances PARP inhibitor sensitivity in ER-positive breast cancer: modulation by N4BP2L2-Mediated restoration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Divulging Patterns: An Analytical Review for Machine Learning Methodologies for Breast Cancer Detection.Journal of Cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer is an alarming global health concern, including a vast and varied set of illnesses with different molecular characteristics. The fusion of sophisticated computational methodologies with extensive biological datasets has emerged as an effective strategy for unravelling complex patterns in cancer oncology. This research delves into breast cancer staging, classification, and diagnosis by leveraging the comprehensive dataset provided by the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). By integrating advanced machine learning algorithms with bioinformatics analysis, it introduces a cutting-edge methodology for identifying complex molecular signatures associated with different subtypes and stages of breast cancer. This study utilizes TCGA gene expression data to detect and categorize breast cancer through the application of machine learning and systems biology techniques. Researchers identified differentially expressed genes in breast cancer and analyzed them using signaling pathways, protein-protein interactions, and regulatory networks to uncover potential therapeutic targets. The study also highlights the roles of specific proteins (MYH2, MYL1, MYL2, MYH7) and microRNAs (such as hsa-let-7d-5p) that are the potential biomarkers in cancer progression founded on several analyses. In terms of diagnostic accuracy for cancer staging, the random forest method achieved 97.19%, while the XGBoost algorithm attained 95.23%. Bioinformatics and machine learning meet in this study to find potential biomarkers that influence the progression of breast cancer. The combination of sophisticated analytical methods and extensive genomic datasets presents a promising path for expanding our understanding and enhancing clinical outcomes in identifying and categorizing this intricate illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.