ReviewJournal of radiation research2025
Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation for ventricular tachycardia: a review of clinical trials and emerging roles of imaging.
Review in Journal of radiation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low-dose ventricular radiotherapy in wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: a prospective, first-in-human, exploratory clinical trial.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
- "From Surface to Substrate: Advancing VT Ablation Strategies for Deep Arrhythmic Substrates"-A Review of Emerging Techniques in Intramural Lesion Formation.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Progressive myocardial metabolic dysfunction after stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation for ventricular tachycardia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a serial multimodality imaging case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2026Article
- Dosimetric feasibility of stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation for ventricular tachycardia in patients with a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Comparison of proton and photon therapy in stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation for ventricular tachycardia.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a severe arrhythmia commonly treated with implantable cardioverter defibrillators, antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation (CA). Although CA is effective in reducing recurrent VT, its impact on survival remains uncertain, especially in patients with extensive scarring. Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) has emerged as a novel treatment for VT in patients unresponsive to CA, leveraging techniques from stereotactic body radiation therapy used in cancer treatments. Recent clinical trials and case series have demonstrated the short-term efficacy and safety of STAR, although long-term outcomes remain unclear. Imaging techniques, such as electroanatomical mapping, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and nuclear imaging, play a crucial role in treatment planning by identifying VT substrates and guiding target delineation. However, challenges persist owing to the complex anatomy and variability in target volume definitions. Advances in imaging and artificial intelligence are expected to improve the precision and efficacy of STAR. The exact mechanisms underlying the antiarrhythmic effects of STAR, including potential fibrosis and improvement in cardiac conduction, are still being explored. Despite its potential, STAR should be cautiously applied in prospective clinical trials, with a focus on optimizing dose delivery and understanding long-term outcomes. Collaborative efforts are necessary to standardize treatment strategies and enhance the quality of life for patients with refractory VT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.