ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2024
Toward clearer recognition and easier usefulness: development of a cross-lingual atherosclerotic cerebrovascular disease ontology.
Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Atherosclerotic cerebrovascular disease could result in a great number of deaths and disabilities. However, it did not acquire enough attention. Less information, statistics, or data on the disease has been revealed. Thus, no systematic concept datasets were released to help clinicians clarify the scope, assist research, and offer maximized value. This study aimed to develop a cross-lingual atherosclerotic cerebrovascular disease ontology; describe the workflow, schema, hierarchical structure, and the highlighted content; design a brand-new rehabilitation ontology; implement the ontology evaluation; and illustrate the application scenarios in real-world scenarios. We implemented nine steps based on the Ontology Development 101 methodologies combined with expert opinions. The ontology included collection and specification of clinical requirements, background investigation and knowledge acquisition, ontology selection and reuse, scope identification, schema definition, concept extraction, concept extension, ontology verification, and ontology evaluation. We evaluated the proposed ontology in the literature classification task. The current ontology included 10 top-level classes, respectively, clinical manifestation, comorbidity, complication, diagnosis, model of atherosclerotic cerebrovascular disease, pathogenesis, prevention, rehabilitation, risk factor, and treatment. There are 1715 concepts in the 11-level ontology, covering 4588 Chinese terms, 6617 English terms, and 972 definitions. The ontology could be applied in real-world scenarios such as information retrieval, new expression discovery, named entity recognition, and knowledge fusion, and the use case proved that it could offer satisfying support to related medical scenarios. The ontology was proven to be useful in text classification tasks, and the weight-F1 score could reach >80% combined with the pretrained model. The proposed ontology provided a clear set of cross-lingual concepts and terms with an explicit hierarchical structure, helping scientific researchers to quickly retrieve relevant medical literature, assisting data scientists to efficiently identify relevant contents in electronic health records, and providing a clear domain framework for academic reference. Database URL: https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/ACVD_ONTOLOGY.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.