ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Motif distribution in genomes gives insights into gene clustering and co-regulation.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MAGNETIC: a web server to fetch gene network based on motif distribution in promoters.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We read the genome as proteins in the cell would - by studying the distributions of 5-6 base motifs of DNA in the whole genome or smaller stretches such as parts of, or whole chromosomes. This led us to some interesting findings about motif clustering and chromosome organization. It is quite clear that the motif distribution in genomes is not random at the length scales we examined: 1 kb to entire chromosomes. The observed-to-expected (OE) ratios of motif distributions show strong correlations in pairs of chromosomes that are susceptible to translocations. With the aid of examples, we suggest that similarity in motif distributions in promoter regions of genes could imply co-regulation. A simple extension of this idea empowers us with the ability to construct gene regulatory networks. Further, we could make inferences about the spatial proximity of genomic fragments using these motif distributions. Spatially proximal regions, as deduced by Hi-C or pcHi-C, were ∼3.5 times more likely to have their motif distributions correlated than non-proximal regions. These correlations had strong contributions from the CTCF protein recognizing motifs which are known markers of topologically associated domains. In general, correlating genomic regions by motif distribution comparisons alone is rife with functional information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.