ArticleHealth education research2025
How are pro- and anti-cannabis messaging exposures related to US young adult cannabis use-related factors?
Article in Health education research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Simple Versus Complex Cannabis Advertising Messages and Warnings on US Young Adults' Product Perceptions.Substance use & addiction journal · 2026Article
- Effects of textual warnings and warning symbols on cannabis advertisements on product perceptions among US young adults.Health education research · 2026Article
- Cannabis and Psychedelics Among U.S. Young Adults: Use, Messaging Exposure, Perceptions, and Legalization Support.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Disparities in Exposure to Cannabis Marketing and Perceptions of Inequalities in Possession Treatment: Differences Across Intersections of Sociodemographic Subgroups.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- A longitudinal mediated examination of legal, commercial, and individual determinants of cannabis and derived cannabis use behaviors and consequences among US young adults.Addictive behaviors · 2026Article
- Adult-use cannabis legalization in the united states: a scoping review of outcome monitoring recommendations.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Exposure to Cannabis in Social Networks and Advertising in Relation to Cannabis-Related Perceptions, Motives, and Use Behaviors Among Young Adults in the US.Substance use & misuse · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Given the diverse sources of cannabis messaging and potential differential effects, this study examined pro- and anti-cannabis messaging exposure overall and via specific channels in relation to cannabis-related perceptions (social acceptability and harm) and behaviors (use status, intentions and frequency; past-year quit attempts). Multivariable regression analyses of 2023 survey data from 4031 US young adults (Mage = 26.29, 59.4% female, 19.0% Hispanic, 13.5% Black and 13.6% Asian) used independent variables representing overall exposure and via specific sources (stores, online, billboards/posters/flyers, TV/movies/radio, print and direct communication), respectively. Greater pro-cannabis messaging exposure correlated with greater perceived social acceptability, lower perceived harm, past-month use, greater use intentions among those reporting past-month nonuse and more days used and fewer quit attempts among those reporting use. Less anti-cannabis messaging exposure correlated with these outcomes, except intentions. Particularly, influential sources of pro-cannabis messaging were online (associated with perceptions, use status, intentions and frequency) and direct communication (perceptions, use, use frequency and quit attempts), and those of anti-cannabis messaging were online (harm and use intentions), direct communication (acceptability, quit attempts) and stores (perceptions, use and quit attempts). Exposure differed by sociodemographics (e.g. sex, race/ethnicity and education). The impact of digital media and targeted communications overall and stores in communicating cannabis-related risks suggest the need for regulation and monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.