ArticleEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging2025
Plasma proteomics improves prediction of coronary plaque progression.
Article in European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding Plaque Instability Through Plasma Proteomics Profiling?JACC. Basic to translational science · 2026Article
- Threonine in Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From Metabolic Syndrome Amino Acid Profiling.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Unraveling Atherosclerosis through Multi-omics: Systematic Insights into the Unique Applications and Clinical Perspectives.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Inflammatory Mechanisms in Acute Coronary Syndromes: From Pathophysiology to Therapeutic Targets.Cells · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsCoronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) offers detailed imaging of plaque burden and composition, with plaque progression being a key determinant of future cardiovascular events. As repeated CCTA scans are burdensome and costly, there is a need for non-invasive identification of plaque progression. This study evaluated whether combining proteomics with traditional risk factors can detect patients at risk for accelerated plaque progression. METHODS AND
resultsThis long-term follow-up study included 97 participants who underwent two CCTA scans and plasma proteomics analysis using the Olink platform. Accelerated plaque progression was defined as rates above the median for percent atheroma volume (PAV), percent non-calcified plaque volume (NCPV), and percent calcified plaque volume (CPV). High-risk plaque (HRP) was identified by positive remodelling or low-density plaque at baseline and/or follow-up. Significant proteins associated with PAV, NCPV, CPV, and HRP development were incorporated into predictive models. The mean baseline age was 58.0 ± 7.4 years, with 63 (65%) male, and a median follow-up of 8.5 ± 0.6 years. The area under the curve (AUC) for accelerated PAV progression increased from 0.830 with traditional risk factors and baseline plaque volume to 0.909 with the protein panel (P = 0.023). For NCPV progression, AUC improved from 0.685 to 0.825 (P = 0.008), while no improvement was observed for CPV progression. For HRP development, AUC increased from 0.791 to 0.860 with the protein panel (P = 0.036).
conclusionIntegrating proteomics with traditional risk factors enhances the prediction of accelerated plaque progression and high-risk plaque development, potentially improving risk stratification and treatment decisions without the need for repeated CCTAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.