Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39658683›Full record

SynthesisEuropean radiology2025

The role of deep learning in diagnostic imaging of spondyloarthropathies: a systematic review.

Mahmud Omar, Abdulla Watad, Dennis McGonagle, Shelly Soffer, Benjamin S Glicksberg, Girish N Nadkarni, Eyal Klang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mahmud OmarTel-Aviv University, Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv, Israel. Mahmudomar70@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-0438-0827
Abdulla WatadTel-Aviv University, Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Dennis McGonagleSection of Musculoskeletal Disease, NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Shelly SofferInstitute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel.
Benjamin S GlicksbergThe Charles Bronfman Institute of Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Girish N NadkarniThe Charles Bronfman Institute of Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Eyal KlangThe Charles Bronfman Institute of Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimDiagnostic imaging is an integral part of identifying spondyloarthropathies (SpA), yet the interpretation of these images can be challenging. This review evaluated the use of deep learning models to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of SpA imaging.

methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched major databases up to February 2024, focusing on studies that applied deep learning to SpA imaging. Performance metrics, model types, and diagnostic tasks were extracted and analyzed. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2.

resultsWe analyzed 21 studies employing deep learning in SpA imaging diagnosis across MRI, CT, and X-ray modalities. These models, particularly advanced CNNs and U-Nets, demonstrated high accuracy in diagnosing SpA, differentiating arthritis forms, and assessing disease progression. Performance metrics frequently surpassed traditional methods, with some models achieving AUCs up to 0.98 and matching expert radiologist performance.

conclusionThis systematic review underscores the effectiveness of deep learning in SpA imaging diagnostics across MRI, CT, and X-ray modalities. The studies reviewed demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy. However, the presence of small sample sizes in some studies highlights the need for more extensive datasets and further prospective and external validation to enhance the generalizability of these AI models. KEY POINTS: Question How can deep learning models improve diagnostic accuracy in imaging for spondyloarthropathies (SpA), addressing challenges in early detection and differentiation from other forms of arthritis? Findings Deep learning models, especially CNNs and U-Nets, showed high accuracy in SpA imaging across MRI, CT, and X-ray, often matching or surpassing expert radiologists. Clinical relevance Deep learning models can enhance diagnostic precision in SpA imaging, potentially reducing diagnostic delays and improving treatment decisions, but further validation on larger datasets is required for clinical integration.

Indexed as

Deep LearningSpondylarthropathiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedConvolutional neural networksDeep learningDiagnostic imagingSacroiliitisSpondyloarthropathies

Identifiers

PMID39658683
PMCPMC12081588

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.