Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39658703›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2024

F-Wave Features in Most Common Chinese Spinocerebellar Ataxias.

Qiong Cai, Huajing You, Wenxiao Xu, Jiajing Yuan, Xunhua Li, Chao Wu, Songjie Liao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qiong CaiDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Major Neurological Diseases; National Key Clinical Department and Key Discipline of Neurology, No.58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Huajing YouDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Major Neurological Diseases; National Key Clinical Department and Key Discipline of Neurology, No.58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Wenxiao XuDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Major Neurological Diseases; National Key Clinical Department and Key Discipline of Neurology, No.58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Jiajing YuanDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Major Neurological Diseases; National Key Clinical Department and Key Discipline of Neurology, No.58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Xunhua LiDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Major Neurological Diseases; National Key Clinical Department and Key Discipline of Neurology, No.58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Chao WuDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Major Neurological Diseases; National Key Clinical Department and Key Discipline of Neurology, No.58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China. wuch35@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Songjie LiaoDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Major Neurological Diseases; National Key Clinical Department and Key Discipline of Neurology, No.58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China. liaosjie@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Scientific Foundation of China 82071366Natural Scientific Foundation of Guangdong Province 2023A1515010486Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou 202201011228Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou 2023A04J2194the Featured Clinical Technique of Guangzhou 2023P-TS21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of F-wave study may help to gain insight into electrophysiological significance of spinocerebellar Ataxias (SCAs). Particularly, the difference of F-wave features between Chinese SCA1, SCA2 and SCA3 patients were scarcely reported. 20 SCA1, 20 SCA2, 46 SCA3 patients and 30 healthy controls underwent nerve (median, ulnar, tibial) conduction and F-wave studies, and electrophysiology parameters were compared between them. Clinical data including ataxia and non-ataxia features was recorded. The study revealed peripheral neuropathological involvement in 80% of SCA1, 100% of SCA2, and 50% of SCA3 Chinese patients. Most patients of all subtypes presented with sensory neuropathy, and F-wave changes. We observed that SCA1 patients had prolonged F-wave latency as well as increased maximum F-wave amplitude and F/M amplitude ratio compared to controls for the first time. Besides, SCA2 patients had decreased F-wave persistence as well as increased maximum F-wave amplitude, F/M amplitude ratio and frequency of giant F-wave. The maximum amplitude of SCA1 correlated positively with disease severity and disease duration. The value of F/M amplitude ratio of SCA2 correlated positively with disease duration. In all subtypes, F-wave of the tibial nerve was the most sensitive measurement index. This study exhibits F-wave characteristics and inter-group differences of the most common Chinese SCAs. F-wave may be a potential biomarker for evaluating the progression of SCAs.

Indexed as

Neural ConductionSpinocerebellar AtaxiasAdultAgedChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultBiomarkerF-waveNerve conduction studyNeurophysiologySpinocerebellar ataxia

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.