ArticleThe journal of international advanced otology2024
Thiol-Disulfide Homeostasis in Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Rats.
Article in The journal of international advanced otology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study was designed to assess if thiol-disulfide homeostasis could be used as diagnostic biomarker in noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) in a laboratory animal model. Methods: The study was carried out with a total of 28 female albino rats in 4 groups: group 1 (control group) included rats that were not exposed to noise or any study treatment; in group 2, following noise exposure, rats received 2 mg of dexamethasone per kilogram of body weight via the intramuscular route for 5 days; in Group 3, rats were exposed to noise and received a saline solution for 5 days, in a volume (0.15 cc) matched to that of dexamethasone administered in group 2; and in group 4, rats were exposed to noise, and blood samples were collected during the early phase to assess thiol-disulfide homeostasis without administering any treatment. Rats in groups 2, 3, and 4 were exposed to 120 dB noise in the 4 kHz octave band for 4 hours. The auditory brainstem response (ABR) test was performed in all groups on day 1 after noise exposure and was repeated in groups 1, 2, and 3 on day 5. Auditory brainstem response thresholds were recorded at 8, 12, 16, 20, and 32 kHz frequencies. Groups 1, 2, and 3 rats were sacrificed on day 5, and group 4 rats were sacrificed by exsanguination on day 1 after noise exposure. Venous blood samples collected from the caudal vena cava were centrifuged and sent to the corresponding laboratory for thiol-disulfide homeostasis studies. After sacrificing the rats, the right and left temporal bones of each rat were removed and stained with hematoxylin eosin for histological studies to explore any pyknotic changes in spiral ganglion cells. Results: Intergroup comparisons by frequency on day 5 of noise exposure showed statistically significantly lower responses in ABR measurements at 8 kHz, 12 kHz, and 16 kHz in group 2 compared to group 3 (P = .003, P=.006, and P=.002). Improvements were observed with dexamethasone administered for therapeutic purposes, particularly if the hearing loss was induced by low-frequency noise. In the assessment of the parameters of thiol-disulfide homeostasis, disulfide/native thiol and disulfide/total thiol ratios and ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) levels were higher in group 4 than in other groups, although only the differences between group 1 and group 4 reached statistical significance. Conclusion: According to this study, thiol-disulfide homeostasis and IMA can be shown as diagnostic biomarkers in NIHL, especially in the early period. The results from our study suggest that these markers may be used as adjunctive diagnostic tools in NIHL, in addition to audiological studies. However, this issue can be clarified with further clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.