Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39659718›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Focus on patient perspectives in climate action policies for healthcare. A German survey analysis on what patients are willing to do.

Florian Scholz, Nikolaus Börner, Sophie Anne Schust, Josefine Schardey, Florian Kühn, Bernhard Renz, Martin Angele, Jens Werner, Markus Guba, Sven Jacob

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. CIRSE Position Statement on Sustainability in Interventional Radiology.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Patients' Perspectives on Climate Change, Health, and Sustainability in Ophthalmology.Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Florian Scholz *Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Nikolaus Börner *Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Sophie Anne SchustDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Josefine SchardeyDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Florian KühnDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Bernhard RenzDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Martin AngeleDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Jens WernerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Markus GubaDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Sven JacobDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The healthcare sector, while dedicated to improving health, paradoxically contributes significantly to global carbon emissions, accounting for approximately 4.9% of global emissions. Despite growing public concern about climate change, few studies have explored patients' awareness and attitudes toward the environmental impact of healthcare. This study aims to assess patients' perspectives on climate change and the sustainability of healthcare practices. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted at Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Hospital in Munich, Germany. Patients were invited to participate in a voluntary, anonymous online survey via strategically placed QR codes throughout the hospital. The survey explored patients' demographic information, environmental awareness, attitudes toward climate-friendly practices in healthcare, and willingness to support sustainable initiatives. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were used to analyze the data. Results: A total of 399 patients completed the survey (87% completion rate). The majority of respondents (92.3%) were aware of climate change, and 82.7% reported prioritizing climate-friendly practices in their personal lives. However, 55.9% of respondents were unaware of the healthcare system's contribution to carbon emissions, and only 18.3% knew about hospitals' climate impact. Despite this, 88.2% of respondents supported environmentally friendly initiatives in hospitals, and 86.5% were open to sustainable alternatives, provided that quality standards were maintained. Participants expressed significant interest in knowing the environmental impact of their treatments, with 63.2% in favor of a Nutri-Score-like system that would display the carbon footprint of medical procedures. Among those, 54.4% indicated that such a system would influence their choice of treatment. Similarly, 62.2% of respondents were interested in knowing the environmental impact of their medications, with 65% reporting that this information would affect their medication choices. A notable proportion of patients (66.2%) indicated willingness to support sustainable healthcare through shorter hospital stays and increased follow-up visits, while 35.8% were open to paying a CO Conclusion: The study highlights a gap between patients' environmental awareness and their knowledge of healthcare's carbon footprint. While patients are generally supportive of sustainable practices in healthcare, their willingness to act diminishes when personal costs or discomfort are involved. A coordinated approach involving policy changes, patient education, and market innovations is essential to promote sustainable practices in healthcare without compromising patient care quality. Further research is needed to explore strategies for bridging the gap between environmental awareness and action in healthcare settings.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareFemaleGermanyHealth PolicyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesadvocacyclimate changehealthcareimplementing changepatient perspectivepolicy

Identifiers

PMID39659718
PMCPMC11629199

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.