Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39659892›Full record

ReviewNature and science of sleep2024

Impact of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment on Dry Eye Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Chung-Wei Lin, Yung-Chun Su, Jin-Dien Liu, Hsiao-Chun Su, Ting-Yi Chiang, Li-Wen Chiu, Hsin-Ching Lin, Chun-Tuan Chang, Pei-Wen Lin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature and science of sleep, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Impact of Ambient Air Pollution on Obstructive Sleep Apnea Surgery: A Longitudinal Study.ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chung-Wei Lin *Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yung-Chun SuDepartment of General Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Jin-Dien LiuDepartment of Education, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Hsiao-Chun SuSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Ting-Yi ChiangDepartment of Urology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Li-Wen ChiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Hsin-Ching Lin *Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8822-0619
Chun-Tuan ChangDepartment of Business Management, Institute of Healthcare Management, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Pei-Wen LinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been reported to influence the ocular surface and may lead to dry eye disease (DED). Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the first-line conservative treatment for OSA. However, CPAP might also have mask-related side effects that could deteriorate DED simultaneously. This study investigated the impact of OSA on DED (Aim 1), and CPAP on DED (Aim 2). Five databases were searched for articles published up to May, 2024. OSA severity, CPAP usage, and DED parameters, including tear breakup time (TBUT), Schirmer test, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), and Corneal Fluorescence Staining Score (CFS), were analyzed. For Aim 1, the random-effects model was used for meta-analysis, and the leave-one-out method was used for sensitivity analysis. For Aim 2, a narrative synthesis with critical appraisal of the literature was performed. Eleven studies with 1,526 patients for Aim 1 and three studies with 180 patients for Aim 2 were included. For Aim 1, OSA patients had poorer dry eye profiles of TBUT, Schirmer test, and OSDI when compared to non-OSA patients. For Aim 2, it seemed that those wearing CPAP for less than half a year did not have enough improvement in dry eye status. Instead, those wearing CPAP for at least a year reached greater therapeutic effects for OSA and DED. We concluded that OSA patients may suffer from poorer dry eye condition compared to non-OSA patients. Besides, wearing CPAP for long enough duration (at least 1 year) seemed to have better improvement in DED.

Indexed as

continuous positive airway pressuredry eye diseasemeta-analysisObstructive sleep apnea

Identifiers

PMID39659892
PMCPMC11629664

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.