ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2024
Recurrence risk of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents on early-stage urothelial carcinoma in patients with end stage renal disease.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Erythropoietin drug targets and cancer risk: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma (UC) predominantly arises in the bladder, but upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUCs) comprise 5-10% of cases. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are at increased risk for UC, and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are frequently used to manage anemia in ESRD. However, ESA use in cancer patients raises concerns about tumor progression and survival outcomes. This study aimed to assess the impact of ESA use on tumor recurrence, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with ESRD and early-stage UC. We analyzed data from the Chang-Gung Research Database (CGRD) in Taiwan, including 850 patients with ESRD and non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and 492 patients with ESRD and localized UTUC. The ESA group was compared to a non-ESA cohort, and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to minimize selection bias. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to evaluate bladder recurrence-free survival, CSS, and OS. In NMIBC patients, ESA use did not significantly affect bladder recurrence-free survival, CSS, or OS. Similarly, ESA use in localized UTUC patients did not increase the risk of bladder recurrence or negatively impact CSS and OS. However, UTUC patients treated with ESA demonstrated a significantly increased risk of contralateral recurrence (P < 0.001). The use of ESA in patients with ESRD and early-stage UC appears safe regarding bladder recurrence, CSS, and OS, but clinicians should remain vigilant for contralateral recurrence in localized UTUC. These findings provide valuable insights into the complex management of anemia in patients with concurrent ESRD and UC, emphasizing the need for tailored clinical monitoring in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.