ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024
Bridging human and machine intelligence: Reverse-engineering radiologist intentions for clinical trust and adoption.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal deep learning framework for recurrence risk stratification in soft tissue sarcoma: a multicenter study.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Cross-attention guided multi-modal network for breast ultrasound diagnosis incorporating objective clinical semantics.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Eye Tracking-Enhanced Deep Learning for Medical Image Analysis: A Systematic Review on Data Efficiency, Interpretability, and Multimodal Integration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Enhancing surgical object detection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy with explicit positional relationship modeling.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the rapidly evolving landscape of medical imaging, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) with clinical expertise offers unprecedented opportunities to enhance diagnostic precision and accuracy. Yet, the "black box" nature of AI models often limits their integration into clinical practice, where transparency and interpretability are important. This paper presents a novel system leveraging the Large Multimodal Model (LMM) to bridge the gap between AI predictions and the cognitive processes of radiologists. This system consists of two core modules, Temporally Grounded Intention Detection (TGID) and Region Extraction (RE). The TGID module predicts the radiologist's intentions by analyzing eye gaze fixation heatmap videos and corresponding radiology reports. Additionally, the RE module extracts regions of interest that align with these intentions, mirroring the radiologist's diagnostic focus. This approach introduces a new task, radiologist intention detection, and is the first application of Dense Video Captioning (DVC) in the medical domain. By making AI systems more interpretable and aligned with radiologist's cognitive processes, this proposed system aims to enhance trust, improve diagnostic accuracy, and support medical education. Additionally, it holds the potential for automated error correction, guiding junior radiologists, and fostering more effective training and feedback mechanisms. This work sets a precedent for future research in AI-driven healthcare, offering a pathway towards transparent, trustworthy, and human-centered AI systems. We evaluated this model using NLG(Natural Language Generation), time-related, and vision-based metrics, demonstrating superior performance in generating temporally grounded intentions on REFLACX and EGD-CXR datasets. This model also demonstrated strong predictive accuracy in overlap scores for medical abnormalities and effective region extraction with high IoU(Intersection over Union), especially in complex cases like cardiomegaly and edema. These results highlight the system's potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and support continuous learning in radiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.