ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
A novel molecular classification system based on the molecular feature score identifies patients sensitive to immune therapy and target therapy.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancements in artificial intelligence for cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction: current applications and emerging opportunities.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is heterogeneous and refractory with multidimensional features. This study aims to investigate its molecular classifications based on multidimensional molecular features scores (FSs) and support classification-guided precision medicine. Methods: Data of bulk RNA sequencing, single nucleotide variation, and single-cell RNA sequencing were collected. Feature scores (FSs) from hallmark pathways, regulatory cell death pathways, metabolism pathways, stemness index, immune scores, estimate scores, etc. were evaluated and screened. Then, the unsupervised clustering on the core FSs was performed and the characteristics of the resulting clusters were identified. Subsequently, machine learning algorithms were used to predict the classifications and prognoses. Additionally, the sensitivity to immune therapy and biological roles of classification-related prognostic genes were also evaluated. Results: We identified four clusters with distinct characteristics. C1 is characterized by high TP53 mutations, immune suppression, and metabolic downregulation, with notable responsiveness to anti-PD1 therapy. C2 exhibited high tumor purity and metabolic activity, moderate TP53 mutations, and cold immunity. C3 represented an early phase with the most favorable prognosis, lower stemness and tumor mutations, upregulated stroma, and hypermetabolism. C4 represented a late phase with the poorest prognosis, highest stemness, higher TP53 mutations, cold immunity, and metabolic downregulation. We further developed practical software for prediction with good performance in the external validation. Additionally, FTCD was identified as a classification-specific prognostic gene with tumor-suppressing role and potential as a therapeutic target, particularly for C1 and C4 patients. Conclusions: The four-layer classification scheme enhances the understanding of HCC heterogeneity, and we also provide robust predictive software for predicting classifications and prognoses. Notably, C1 is more sensitive to anti-PD1 therapies and FTCD is a promising therapeutic target, particularly for C1 and C4. These findings provide new insights into classification-guided precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.