ArticleHeliyon2024
Abnormal intrinsic brain functional network dynamics in patients with retinal detachment based on graph theory and machine learning.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-level static and dynamic graph-theoretical analyses of resting-state functional networks in a Chinese cohort of preterm neonates.iScience · 2026Article
- Multiscale Cortical Remodeling Following Abrupt Visual Deafferentation in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: Imaging Transcriptomics and Neurotransmitter Mapping.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Alterations in static and dynamic topological properties of brain functional network after chronic high altitude exposure: a panel study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Abnormal intrinsic brain functional network dynamics in patients with postherpetic neuralgia.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: and purpose: The investigation of functional plasticity and remodeling of the brain in patients with retinal detachment (RD) has gained increasing attention and validation. However, the precise alterations in the topological configuration of dynamic functional networks are still not fully understood. This study aimed to investigate the topological structure of dynamic brain functional networks in RD patients. Methods: We recruited 32 patients with RD and 33 healthy controls (HCs) to participate in resting-state fMRI. Employing the sliding time window analysis and K-means clustering method, we sought to identify dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) variability patterns in both groups. The investigation into the topological structure of whole-brain functional networks utilized a graph theoretical approach. Furthermore, we employed machine learning analysis, selecting altered topological properties as classification features to distinguish RD patients from HCs. Results: All participants exhibited four distinct states of dynamic functional connectivity. Compared to the healthy control (HC) group, patients with RD experienced a significant reduction in the number of transitions among these four states. Additionally, the dynamic topological properties of RD patients demonstrated notable changes in both global and node-specific characteristics, with these changes correlating with clinical parameters. The support vector machine (SVM) model used for classification achieved an accuracy of 0.938, an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.988, and both sensitivity and specificity of 0.937. Conclusion: The alterations in the topological properties of the brain in RD patients may indicate the integration function and information exchange efficiency of the whole brain network were reduced. In addition, the topological properties hold considerable promise for distinguishing between RD and HCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.