ArticleJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025
TriHex 2.0-Advancing Skin Health Science and the TriHex Technology.
Article in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing Outcomes of Procedure Pairing With Next Generation Regenerating Skin Nectar With TriHex+ Technology.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Trial
- A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Split-Face Trial Evaluating the Effects of Pre-Conditioning With a TriHex Technology Serum Nectar 2.0 Versus a Vehicle in Subjects Undergoing Elective Facelift Surgery.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Trial
- A Multi-Center Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of the Next Generation TriHex Technology Antiaging Regimen.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Trial
- TriHex Technology and Reversal of Solar Elastosis: Dispelling Some Myths.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Review
- Article
- Effects of hyaluronic acid on skin at the cellular level: a systematic review.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2025Article
- Exploring the Role of Tripeptides in Wound Healing and Skin Regeneration: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe original TriHex combination-Tripeptide-1 and Hexapeptide-12 (TriHex) encompasses a peptide combination selected for its ability to modulate the extracellular matrix (ECM) by progressively eliminating clumped collagen and elastin fragments and then stimulating replacement with new collagen and elastin. Incorporation of a proprietary, patent-pending Octapeptide-45 (Octa) to the TriHex original provides potential for added benefit based on the peptide's capacity to stimulate hyaluronic acid (HA) and its anticipated added benefit in wound healing. This is named TriHex 2.0 in the paper. MATERIALS AND
methodsA full-scale validation process was structured to assess Octa synergy with TriHex using an ex vivo model, assessing ECM changes histologically in relation to elastin, HA and basement membrane components. In addition, gene expression studies were undertaken, including bulk and single cell sequencing analysis to assess the particular changes that occurred by adding Octa to the TriHex. Following the gene expression analysis, a further round of ex vivo studies was conducted to assess protein expression of the defined differentially expressed genes using histological staining.
resultsOcta synergized with TriHex as demonstrated by significantly upregulated genes (p < 0.05) affecting the ECM and basement membrane. A histological assessment using the ex vivo model demonstrated tropoelastin intensity significantly increasing with TriHex (43%) and 2.0 (42%) (p < 0.05 for both) compared to untreated explants. HA levels (CD44 intensity) significantly increased with TriHex (69%; p < 0.01), while TriHex 2.0 demonstrated HA levels 160% greater (p < 0.001) than the untreated tissue. Single cell sequencing identified a gene expression profile upregulation relating to ECM modulation and wound healing in both TriHex and 2.0, but TriHex 2.0 showed additional activities in basement membrane physiology, stem cell recruitment, and protection of fibroblasts against cellular senescence.
conclusionThe addition of Octapeptide-45 to TriHex technology in the form of TriHex 2.0 is a significant advance to TriHex technology science. Both forms demonstrate ECM remodeling and positive wound healing, but supplementary benefits are evident including increased elastin and hyaluronic acid stimulation, added effects on the basement membrane, additional wound healing capacity in basal keratinocytes and anti-senescent effects in fibroblasts. This is helpful for pre-conditioning of the skin prior to procedures and post procedure related to additional ECM remodeling, wound healing advantages, senescent cell targeting and DEJ strengthening. Clinical studies to follow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.