ArticleThe journal of international advanced otology2024
The Effectiveness of Ebselen in Facial Nerve Crush Injury: An Experimental Study.
Article in The journal of international advanced otology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The role of antioxidants in facial nerve injury.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ebselen is a neuroprotective drug that protects cellular components from oxidative damage by modulating enzymatic cofactors, metalloproteins, gene expression, antioxidant-anti-inflammatory effects, and immunological systems. Our goal was to compare the efficacy of Ebselen and methylprednisolone on rat facial nerve crush injury. Methods: Thirty healthy male Wistar rats (mean weight of 245 g) were used in this study. The rats were randomly divided into four groups: Group 1 (ebselen group), Group 2 (methylprednisolone group), Group 3 (control group), and Group 4 (sham group (the right side of the control group)). Except for the sham group, all groups had their left facial nerve crushed. Three weeks after surgery, prospective functional, histologic, and electrophysiologic recovery was reported. Results: The ebselen group and methylprednisolone group had similar and more significant recovery at Nerve Excitability Thresholds (NET) at the end of three weeks. These groups also showed similar features in terms of histopathological parameters such as axonal degeneration, vascular congestion, axon diameter, and myelin thickness. Except for the macrovacuolization parameter, both showed statistically better results than the control group. Although there was an earlier improvement in the whiskers and blink tests in the ebselen group compared to the methylprednisolone and control groups, complete recovery was observed in all groups on the 21st day. Conclusion: Ebselen was found to be similarly effective to methylprednisolone in nerve regeneration in a rat model of experimental facial nerve crush. Considering that methylprednisolone has serious systemic side effects, ebselen may be a good alternative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.