Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39661231›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024

An institutional analysis of hospital readmission following a robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Denis Gratsianskiy, Dharti Patel, Iswanto Sucandy, Tara M Pattilachan, Maria Christodoulou, Alexander Rosemurgy, Sharona B Ross

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Telesurgery across continents: a scoping review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Denis GratsianskiyForegut and HPB Division, Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite #500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA.
Dharti PatelForegut and HPB Division, Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite #500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA.
Iswanto SucandyForegut and HPB Division, Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite #500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA.
Tara M PattilachanForegut and HPB Division, Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite #500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA.
Maria ChristodoulouForegut and HPB Division, Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite #500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA.
Alexander RosemurgyForegut and HPB Division, Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite #500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA.
Sharona B RossForegut and HPB Division, Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite #500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA. mysharonaross@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study sought to identify the primary reasons for hospital readmissions and examine patient outcomes and associated costs following readmission after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 435 patients who underwent robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy between 2012 and 2024. Readmitted patients within 30 days post-surgery were compared to non-readmitted patients using Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test. Data are presented as median (mean ± SD). In the study cohort, 86 patients (20%) were readmitted within 30 days after surgery. No significant differences were found in patient demographics or outcomes. The most common causes for readmission included insufficient patient education (n = 18), infection (n = 16), and gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 13). The readmitted cohort had significantly higher costs at $40,452 (± 30,724) compared to $31,438 (± 31,546.2) for non-readmitted patients (p < 0.001). Median survival was similar between the two groups (36 vs. 34 months, p = 0.88). Although some readmissions are inevitable, this study provides compelling evidence that inadequate patient education is a primary contributor to increased healthcare costs. The lack of sufficient education appears to have no mitigating effect on patient outcomes. Implementing a proactive, thorough patient education approach, combined with improved emergency department awareness, presents a promising strategy for reducing costly readmissions.

Indexed as

PancreaticoduodenectomyPatient ReadmissionRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesHospital ReadmissionsOutcomesPancreaticoduodenectomyRobotic Surgery

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.