Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39661244›Full record

Observational studyObesity surgery2025

Long-Term Outcome of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: 10-Year Follow-Up of a Single Institution Series.

Sneha Makkapati, Muvva Sri Harsha, Raj Palaniappan

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Obesity surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sneha MakkapatiApollo Hospitals, Chennai, India. snehamakkapati@gmail.com.
Muvva Sri HarshaApollo Hospitals, Chennai, India.
Raj PalaniappanApollo Hospitals, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy, safety, nutritional status, and resolution of obesity complications of patients following one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB).

methodsA retrospective observational study of patients who underwent OAGB in our center between January 2011 and December 2013 was performed.

resultsDuring the study period, 152 patients underwent OAGB procedure in our center. Among them, 26 patients were lost to follow up and therefore were excluded from the data analysis. A total of 126 patients completed long-term follow-up of 10 years. The mean age of patients at baseline was 41 ± 12.5 years (range 20-68). At 10-year follow-up, mean excess weight loss (EWL) was 68.9 ± 22.8%. Mean BMI was 29.7 ± 12.9 kg/m

conclusionsOAGB is an effective choice of bariatric/metabolic surgery for patients with higher BMI which provides good weight loss in terms of % TWL and % EWL without significant recurrent weight gain or inadequate weight loss with negligible nutritional deficiencies.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassAdultAgedAnastomosis, SurgicalBody Mass IndexFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutritional StatusObesity, MorbidRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWeight LossYoung AdultBariatricLong-term follow-upOAGBSafety

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.