Evidence mapPaperPMID 39662064Full record

ReviewActa haematologica2025

Clinical Challenges in Treating Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: A Clinically Oriented Review.

Idan Goldberg, Galia Spectre, Pia Raanani, Hugo Ten Cate, Avi Leader

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta haematologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Treatment outcomes of combination versus monotherapy inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Idan GoldbergInstitute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Centre, Rabin Medical Centre, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Galia SpectreInstitute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Centre, Rabin Medical Centre, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Pia RaananiInstitute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Centre, Rabin Medical Centre, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Hugo Ten CateDepartments of Internal Medicine and Biochemistry, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht Universiy Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Avi LeaderHematology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

The Patient-Reported Outcomes, Community-Engagement and Language (PRO-CEL) CoreP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · 1985 to 2025
$88.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManaging cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a significant clinical challenge due to several factors such as increased bleeding tendency, frailty, and drug-drug interactions. For many years, the drug of choice for treating CAT was low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Recently, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) entered to the therapeutic milieu of CAT. However, due to the large diversity among patients with CAT in clinical and laboratory characteristics, not all patients will equally benefit from treatment with DOACs. Furthermore, several subgroups of patients with CAT have specific characteristics that influence the anticoagulant decision-making process. SUMMARY: In this review, we present four different theoretical clinical case scenarios, each representing a different challenge that is associated with thrombosis management; brain metastasis, malignancies of the gastrointestinal tract, drug-drug interactions (DDIs), and thrombocytopenia. By reviewing current literature, we suggest our clinical approach for managing these cases in the era of DOACs. KEY MESSAGES: (1) The management of patients with brain tumors and CAT is challenging due to increased risk for both intracranial hemorrhage and recurrent venous thromboembolism. Both LMWH and DOACs are optional treatment in this setting. (2) There are conflicting data regarding the bleeding risk in patients with GI malignancies. Treatment with LMWH should be considered specifically in patients with advanced disease and unresectable tumors. (3) There is a paucity of data regarding DDI in patients with CAT. However, caution should be exercised when prescribing DOACs to patients receiving concurrent medications that either affect DOAC metabolism or influence bleeding risk. (4) The management of patients with CAT and thrombocytopenia depends on the severity of thrombocytopenia and the timing of the thrombotic event.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsBrain NeoplasmsNeoplasmsThrombosisDisease ManagementDrug InteractionsHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHumansThrombocytopeniaAnticoagulantsHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightBrain tumorsCancer-associated thrombosisDirect oral anticoagulantsDrug-drug interactionGastrointestinal tumorsThrombocytopenia

Identifiers

PMID39662064
PMCPMC12306955

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.