ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2024
Performance of automated machine learning in detecting fundus diseases based on ophthalmologic B-scan ultrasound images.
Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An ultrasound foundation model for the stratification of vision impairment and eye cancer risk.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Advanced Preoperative Imaging in Macula-Off Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: Emerging Diagnostic and Prognostic Insights for Clinical Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- OBUSight: Clinically Aligned Generative AI for Ophthalmic Ultrasound Interpretation and Diagnosis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based detection of retinal detachment with vitreous hemorrhage in ocular ultrasound images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate the efficacy of automated machine learning (AutoML) models in detecting fundus diseases using ocular B-scan ultrasound images.
methodsOphthalmologists annotated two B-scan ultrasound image datasets to develop three AutoML models-single-label, multi-class single-label and multi-label-on the Vertex artificial intelligence (AI) platform. Performance of these models was compared among themselves and against existing bespoke models for binary classification tasks.
resultsThe training set involved 3938 images from 1378 patients, while batch predictions used an additional set of 336 images from 180 patients. The single-label AutoML model, trained on normal and abnormal fundus images, achieved an area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.9943. The multi-class single-label model, focused on single-pathology images, recorded an AUPRC of 0.9617, with performance metrics of these two single-label models proving comparable to those of previously published models. The multi-label model, designed to detect both single and multiple pathologies, posted an AUPRC of 0.9650. Pathology classification AUPRCs for the multi-class single-label model ranged from 0.9277 to 1.0000 and from 0.8780 to 0.9980 for the multi-label model. Batch prediction accuracies ranged from 86.57% to 97.65% for various fundus conditions in the multi-label AutoML model. Statistical analysis demonstrated that the single-label model significantly outperformed the other two models in all evaluated metrics (p<0.05).
conclusionAutoML models, developed by clinicians, effectively detected multiple fundus lesions with performance on par with that of deep-learning models crafted by AI specialists. This underscores AutoML's potential to revolutionise ophthalmologic diagnostics, facilitating broader accessibility and application of sophisticated diagnostic technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.