ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Deep Learning-Based Body Composition Analysis for Cancer Patients Using Computed Tomographic Imaging.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Based Imaging Assessment of Body Composition in Oncology: A Step Toward Routine Clinical Practice Integration.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- CT Body Composition Changes Predict Survival in Immunotherapy-Treated Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Cancers · 2026Article
- Skeletal Muscle Mass Estimation from Lower Leg Digital Images Using Machine Learning.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Malnutrition is a commonly observed side effect in cancer patients, with a 30-85% worldwide prevalence in this population. Existing malnutrition screening tools miss ~ 20% of at-risk patients at initial screening and do not capture the abnormal body composition phenotype. Meanwhile, the gold-standard clinical criteria to diagnose malnutrition use changes in body composition as key parameters, particularly body fat and skeletal muscle mass loss. Diagnostic imaging, such as computed tomography (CT), is the gold-standard in analyzing body composition and typically accessible to cancer patients as part of the standard of care. In this study, we developed a deep learning-based body composition analysis approach over a diverse dataset of 200 abdominal/pelvic CT scans from cancer patients. The proposed approach segments adipose tissue and skeletal muscle using Swin UNEt TRansformers (Swin UNETR) at the third lumbar vertebrae (L3) level and automatically localizes L3 before segmentation. The proposed approach involves the first transformer-based deep learning model for body composition analysis and heatmap regression-based vertebra localization in cancer patients. Swin UNETR attained 0.92 Dice score in adipose tissue and 0.87 Dice score in skeletal muscle segmentation, significantly outperforming convolutional benchmarks including the 2D U-Net by 2-12% Dice score (p-values < 0.033). Moreover, Swin UNETR predictions showed high agreement with ground-truth areas of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue by 0.7-0.93 R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.