Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39663408›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2025

Metastability demystified - the foundational past, the pragmatic present and the promising future.

Fran Hancock, Fernando E Rosas, Andrea I Luppi, Mengsen Zhang, Pedro A M Mediano, Joana Cabral, Gustavo Deco, Morten L Kringelbach, Michael Breakspear, J A Scott Kelso and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cortical synchrony is reduced in Alzheimer's disease and relates to arousal state.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  10. Music as a scientific metaphor for mind and brain.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2026
    Review
  11. Linearizing and Forecasting: A Reservoir Computing Route to Digital Twins of the Brain.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Brain glucodynamic variability is an essential feature of the metabolism-cognition relationship.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Fran Hancock *Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. fran.hancock@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7383-7205
Fernando E Rosas *Department of Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK. f.rosas@sussex.ac.uk.
Andrea I LuppiCentre for Eudaimonia and Human Flourishing, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3461-6431
Mengsen ZhangDepartment of Computational Mathematics, Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Pedro A M MedianoDepartment of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1789-5894
Joana CabralCentre for Eudaimonia and Human Flourishing, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6715-0826
Gustavo DecoComputational Neuroscience Group, Center for Brain and Cognition, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8995-7583
Morten L KringelbachCentre for Eudaimonia and Human Flourishing, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3908-6898
Michael BreakspearSchool of Psychological Sciences, College of Engineering, Science and the Environment, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
J A Scott KelsoCenter for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7740-2487
Federico E TurkheimerDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthy brain function depends on balancing stable integration between brain areas for effective coordinated functioning, with coexisting segregation that allows subsystems to express their functional specialization. Metastability, a concept from the dynamical systems literature, has been proposed as a key signature that characterizes this balance. Building on this principle, the neuroscience literature has leveraged the phenomenon of metastability to investigate various aspects of brain function in health and disease. However, this body of work often uses the notion of metastability heuristically, and sometimes inaccurately, making it difficult to navigate the vast literature, interpret findings and foster further development of theoretical and experimental methodologies. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of metastability and its applications in neuroscience, covering its scientific and historical foundations and the practical measures used to assess it in empirical data. We also provide a critical analysis of recent theoretical developments, clarifying common misconceptions and paving the road for future developments.

Indexed as

BrainModels, NeurologicalNeurosciencesAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.