Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39663941›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of technology assessment in health care2024

Food for thought: more explicit guidance for inclusion of caregiver perspectives in health technology assessment.

Siobhan Bourke, Chris Skedgel, Yasmina Martí-Gil, Peter J Neumann, Louis P Garrison, Samantha Benham-Hermetz, Frauke Becker, Maria João Garcia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Siobhan BourkePutnam, Patient Reported Outcomes, Ashby-De-La-Zouch, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8861-9841
Chris SkedgelOffice of Health Economics, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4989-8846
Yasmina Martí-GilF Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Peter J NeumannTufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1226-4073
Louis P GarrisonUniversity of Washington - Seattle Campus, Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Samantha Benham-HermetzAlzheimer's Research UK, Cambridge, UK.
Frauke BeckerPutnam, Patient Reported Outcomes, Ashby-De-La-Zouch, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1175-3932
Maria João GarciaF Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

Roche
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caregivers can play an important role in supporting and caring for people with progressive, life-threatening, or debilitating conditions. However, this supportive role can expose caregivers to various detrimental financial, physical, and psychosocial issues. When evaluating medical technologies for reimbursement decisions, health technology assessment (HTA) agencies typically focus on the treatment's impact on patients and ignore or downplay the impact on caregivers. Including caregiver impacts within a wider societal perspective may better enable health systems to maximize health benefits from available resources. However, the lack of clear guidance or methodological recommendations from decision makers on the inclusion of caregiver impacts limits the number of HTA submissions that consider these effects. We outline a conceptual framework based on intensity and duration of caregiving to guide researchers, industry, and decision makers when developing policies for the inclusion of caregiver outcomes and justify their inclusion based on expected caregiver burden in identified circumstances.

Indexed as

CaregiversTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalDecision MakingHumanscaregiverscarershealth technology assessmentinformal caremethodological guidance

Identifiers

PMID39663941
PMCPMC11703619

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.