ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2024
MLR-predictor: a versatile and efficient computational framework for multi-label requirements classification.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Requirements classification is an essential task for development of a successful software by incorporating all relevant aspects of users' needs. Additionally, it aids in the identification of project failure risks and facilitates to achieve project milestones in more comprehensive way. Several machine learning predictors are developed for binary or multi-class requirements classification. However, a few predictors are designed for multi-label classification and they are not practically useful due to less predictive performance. Method: MLR-Predictor makes use of innovative OkapiBM25 model to transforms requirements text into statistical vectors by computing words informative patterns. Moreover, predictor transforms multi-label requirements classification data into multi-class classification problem and utilize logistic regression classifier for categorization of requirements. The performance of the proposed predictor is evaluated and compared with 123 machine learning and 9 deep learning-based predictive pipelines across three public benchmark requirements classification datasets using eight different evaluation measures. Results: The large-scale experimental results demonstrate that proposed MLR-Predictor outperforms 123 adopted machine learning and 9 deep learning predictive pipelines, as well as the state-of-the-art requirements classification predictor. Specifically, in comparison to state-of-the-art predictor, it achieves a 13% improvement in macro F1-measure on the PROMISE dataset, a 1% improvement on the EHR-binary dataset, and a 2.5% improvement on the EHR-multiclass dataset. Discussion: As a case study, the generalizability of proposed predictor is evaluated on softwares customer reviews classification data. In this context, the proposed predictor outperformed the state-of-the-art BERT language model by F-1 score of 1.4%. These findings underscore the robustness and effectiveness of the proposed MLR-Predictor in various contexts, establishing its utility as a promising solution for requirements classification task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.