ReviewBladder (San Francisco, Calif.)2024
Recent advances in the diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction in men.
Review in Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) for bladder outlet obstruction using urodynamics as reference standard: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Characterization of global and region-specific transcriptomic alterations in the bladder following acute partial bladder outlet obstruction in female mini-swine.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Pilot Study of Progressive Urethral Sub-Obstruction in a Canine Model: Bladder Functional and Structural Changes and Exploratory Evaluation of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Bladder Outlet Obstruction Secondary to a Prostatic Cyst in a Young Adult: A Rare Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Comparative Functional Outcomes of Bipolar TURP and Bladder Neck Incision in Male Bladder Outlet Obstruction.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2026Article
- Correlation between chronic prostate inflammation and overactive bladder symptoms following transurethral resection of the prostate due to benign prostate hyperplasia.The Canadian journal of urology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) represents a common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms in men, frequently resulting from benign prostatic hyperplasia. Key symptoms include both obstructive and irritative urinary tract symptoms, such as dysuria, increased frequency and urgency of urination, and recurrent urinary tract infections. BOO can also cause upper urinary tract dilation (hydronephrosis), damage structure, and impair function of the bladder. Objective: Early diagnosis of BOO is essential to the protection of kidney and bladder functions. The gold standard for diagnosing BOO is urodynamic studies (UDS), which measure detrusor pressure and urinary flow. However, UDS is an invasive test and is associated with risks for urinary tract infections, bothersome urinary symptoms, and hematuria. Given the invasiveness and discomfort associated with UDS, non-invasive diagnostic methods have been developed. Nevertheless, the main limitation of these techniques is the variability in threshold values, highlighting the need for further standardization of measurement protocols. This article reviews the current diagnostic approaches for BOO in men and explores their clinical utility. Conclusion: Various non-invasive diagnostic methods are promising; yet, UDS remains the primary diagnostic approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.