Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39664115›Full record

ReviewBladder (San Francisco, Calif.)2024

Recent advances in the diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction in men.

Ruoyu Li, Yuancheng Zhou, Xingyuan Xiao, Bing Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ruoyu LiDepartment of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China.
Yuancheng ZhouDepartment of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China.
Xingyuan XiaoDepartment of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China.
Bing LiDepartment of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) represents a common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms in men, frequently resulting from benign prostatic hyperplasia. Key symptoms include both obstructive and irritative urinary tract symptoms, such as dysuria, increased frequency and urgency of urination, and recurrent urinary tract infections. BOO can also cause upper urinary tract dilation (hydronephrosis), damage structure, and impair function of the bladder. Objective: Early diagnosis of BOO is essential to the protection of kidney and bladder functions. The gold standard for diagnosing BOO is urodynamic studies (UDS), which measure detrusor pressure and urinary flow. However, UDS is an invasive test and is associated with risks for urinary tract infections, bothersome urinary symptoms, and hematuria. Given the invasiveness and discomfort associated with UDS, non-invasive diagnostic methods have been developed. Nevertheless, the main limitation of these techniques is the variability in threshold values, highlighting the need for further standardization of measurement protocols. This article reviews the current diagnostic approaches for BOO in men and explores their clinical utility. Conclusion: Various non-invasive diagnostic methods are promising; yet, UDS remains the primary diagnostic approach.

Indexed as

Benign prostatic hyperplasiaBladder outlet obstructionDiagnosis

Identifiers

PMID39664115
PMCPMC11631724

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.