ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Exploring air pollution awareness: insights from interviews with technology enthusiasts using wearable monitoring devices.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to investigate shifts in awareness regarding air pollution and its correlation with interest in using wearable devices for air quality monitoring. 16 healthy participants, predominantly engineers, residing or studying in Milan, were interviewed to assess their knowledge and interest in air pollution. Participants then walked a predefined route of 4.5 km in Milan while observing real-time air pollution data recorded by a wrist-worn wearable device. Post-walk interviews explored changes in awareness and enthusiasm for personal air quality monitoring. Results indicated widespread recognition of pollution sources, including industries, transportation, and agricultural activities, and health effects. Interestingly, reliance on sensory cues for air quality evaluation was prevalent among participants, underscoring a potential bias toward olfactory indicators. Despite interest in personal air quality monitoring, concerns regarding continuous monitoring leading to feelings of powerlessness and mental stress were noted. Nevertheless, participants expressed interest in actionable information to mitigate these concerns and promote lifestyle choices to decrease exposure to pollutants. Notably, a shift in awareness was observed following interaction with the monitoring device, indicating its potential to enhance public awareness and support for air quality policies. Findings underscore the importance of technological interventions in promoting public awareness and understanding of air pollution dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.