ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2024
Lipid-lowering agent preferences among patients with hypercholesterolemia: a focus group study.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Gene therapy and genome editing for lipoprotein disorders.European heart journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-adherence to lipid-lowering agents poses significant risks to patients and diminishes treatment effectiveness. Current understanding of patients' preferences regarding the characteristics of these agents is limited. This study aims to qualitatively identify the barriers to lipid-lowering medication adherence and the factors considered by patients with hypercholesterolemia when choosing lipid-lowering agents, and to inform the design of a medication preference study. Methods: Face-to-face focus group interviews were conducted with Cantonese-speaking patients diagnosed with hypercholesterolemia in Hong Kong. Patients were recruited by cardiologists at a university-affiliated hospital using convenience sampling. The interviews consisted of three parts: gathering patients' perceptions of disease and medication, identifying important factors in selecting lipid-lowering agents, and completing the medication preference tasks designed using the Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) method. Thematic analysis was used to categorise the codes derived from the transcripts into higher-order themes. Results: Twenty patients completed the focus group interviews on the university campus between January and March 2023. Four main themes emerged: medication management issues, patients' medication preferences, structure, and comprehension of preference tasks. Barriers to medication adherence included lack of knowledge, a high pill burden, poor communication with healthcare providers, minimal treatment decision involvement, limited access to medication information, side effects, and forgetfulness. Factors influencing medication choice were treatment regimen (i.e. the route and frequency of administration), effectiveness, side effects, doctors' opinions, drug interactions, and out-of-pocket costs. Despite suggestions for modifying attributes and levels, the medication preference tasks effectively reflected patients' trade-offs. Conclusions: The identified barriers to medication adherence and the factors influencing medication choice highlight the importance of considering patients' perspectives. These insights could assist decision-makers in selecting medications that align with patient preferences, thereby promoting medication adherence. A large-scale DCE preference study will be conducted in Hong Kong to quantify the relative importance of the attributes of lipid-lowering agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.