Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39664869›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2024

The BSSO Foundry: A community of practice for ontologies in the behavioural and social sciences.

Janna Hastings, Lisa Zhang, Paulina Schenk, Robert West, Björn Gehrke, William R Hogan, Bruce Chorpita, Marie Johnston, Marta M Marques, Thomas L Webb and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Janna HastingsInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3469-4923
Lisa ZhangCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4255-9609
Paulina SchenkCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5239-1977
Robert WestDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6398-0921
Björn GehrkeInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7488-0257
William R HoganData Science Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9881-1017
Bruce ChorpitaDepartment of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Marie JohnstonInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0124-4827
Marta M MarquesNational School of Public Health, Comprehensive Health Research Centre, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4797-9557
Thomas L WebbSchool of Psychology, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9320-0068
Harriet M BairdSchool of Psychology, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.
Geert CrombezDepartment of Experimental-Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Flanders, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4744-8561
Susan MichieCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0063-6378

Funding

Advancing Prevention Research In Cancer through Ontology Tools (The APRICOT project) Project Narrative U01CA291884 · NCI · UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON · PI Susan Michie · 2024 to 2026
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA291884Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been a rapid expansion in the quantity and complexity of data, information and knowledge created in the behavioural and social sciences, yet the field is not advancing understanding, practice or policy to the extent that the insights warrant. One challenge is that research often progresses in disciplinary silos and is reported using inconsistent and ambiguous terminology. This makes it difficult to integrate and aggregate findings to produce cumulative bodies of knowledge that can be translated to applied settings. Ontologies can address these challenges; their development and use have the potential to accelerate the behavioural and social sciences. Ontologies can facilitate communication through precise specification and dissemination of terms, and enable efficient data integration, sharing, comparison and analysis. The widespread use of ontologies in the biomedical and biological sciences has led to multiple successes. It is time now for the behavioural and social sciences to follow that lead. In recent years, a number of ontologies have been developed within the behavioural and social sciences; however, efforts have tended to be isolated, with limited resources to support developers and those who work (or would like to work) with and use ontologies. There is a need for coordination and exchange to reduce duplication of work and leverage the value of a community to support the interoperability of these ontologies (linking of entities across domains and datasets). We have therefore initiated the Behavioural and Social Sciences Ontology (BSSO) Foundry, a community of practice and online repository for the development, adoption and use of ontologies in the behavioural and social sciences. The BSSO Foundry aligns with and builds upon the model provided by the Open Biological and Biomedical Ontology Foundry. We describe this new initiative and how to join and contribute to the community of interoperable ontologies for the behavioural and social sciences.

Indexed as

behavioural and social sciencescommunity of practiceinteroperableontology

Identifiers

PMID39664869
PMCPMC11632217

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.