ArticleShock (Augusta, Ga.)2025
A CLINICAL PREDICTION MODEL FOR SHORT-TERM PROGNOSIS IN PATIENTS WITH NON-ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION-RELATED CARDIOGENIC SHOCK.
Article in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanistic Studies of Lactate in Heart Failure: From Metabolic Biomarker to Therapeutic Target.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractBackground : While acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is widely recognized as the primary cause of cardiogenic shock (CS), non-AMI-related CS has been excluded from the majority of CS studies. Information on its prognostic factors remains largely understudied, and it is necessary to focus on these patients to identify the specific risk factors. In this study, we aimed to build and validate a predictive nomogram and risk classification system. Methods: 1298 patients and 548 patients with CS from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV and III databases were included in the study after excluding patients with AMI. Lasso and logistic regression analysis were used to identify statistically significant predictors, which were finally involved in the nomogram. The predictive performance of the nomogram was validated by calibration plots and was compared with other scoring systems by area under curve and decision curve analysis curves. Results: Age, heart rate, white blood cell count, albumin level, lactic acid level, GCS score, 24-h urine output, and vasopressor use were identified as the most critical factors for in-hospital death. Based on these results, a nomogram was established for predicting in-hospital mortality. The area under curve value of the nomogram was 0.806 in the training group and 0.814 and 0.730 in the internal and external validation sets, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of other commonly used intensive care unit scoring systems (Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Acute Physiology Score III, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment). In addition, the survival curve showed significant differences in the 30-day survival of the three risk subgroups divided by the nomogram. Conclusion: For non-AMI-associated CS, a predictive nomogram and risk classification system were developed and validated, and the nomogram demonstrated good performance in prognostic prediction and risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.