ArticlePloS one2024
Resting-state EEG microstate features for Alzheimer's disease classification.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The EEG analysis and identification of Alzheimer's disease: a review.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- The AHEPA EEG benchmark: setting the standard for machine learning in dementia diagnosis, a scoping review.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2026Article
- Resting-State EEG Microstate Dynamics as Neurophysiological Biomarkers Across the Alzheimer's Disease Continuum: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Consolidated Framework for the Detection of Alzheimer's Disease Using EEG Signals and Hybrid Models.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An interpretable deep learning diagnostic framework for early Alzheimer's disease based on EEG microstate spectra and multi-branch CNN.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Dynamic Mode Decomposition-Based Clustered Pattern Projection for Reliable Alzheimer's Disease Detection from EEG.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Electroencephalography for early Alzheimer's disease diagnosis: from advanced feature engineering to interpretable ai and clinical translation.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
- Explainable machine learning for Alzheimer's disease characterization using small-sample EEG data.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- MSRLNet: A Multi-Source Fusion and Feedback Network for EEG Feature Recognition in ADHD.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Translational approach for dementia subtype classification using convolutional neural network based on EEG connectome dynamics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Resting-state electroencephalogram (EEG) microstate analysis resolves EEG signals into topographical maps representing discrete, sequential network activations. These maps can be used to identify patterns in EEGs that may be indicative of underlying neurological conditions. One such pattern is observed in EEGs of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), where a global microstate disorganization is evident. We initially investigated the classification efficacy of microstate parameters as markers for AD classification. Subsequently, we compared the classification efficacy of EEG conventional features to ascertain the superiority of microstate features. We extracted raw EEG data from a public, independent database, OpenNeuro EEG. The raw EEG was subjected to preprocessing and band-pass filtering to obtain five distinct frequency bands. The SVM classifier was used to input the microstate feature set to determine the one with the best classification effect as the main band. In order to verify the advantage of the microstate features, the AD group and the healthy control group were filtered for the main frequency bands respectively. Then the microstate feature set and the regular feature set were extracted. The two feature sets were input into four different conventional machine learning classifiers, namely SVM, KNN, RF, and LR, in order to avoid the classifiers as the dependent variable. And the comparison of the classification results of simply two feature sets as the dependent variable can be obtained. The results show that in the Alpha (8-13 Hz) sub-band, the microstate feature set as model input to SVM is optimal for the recognition of AD, with a classification accuracy of 99.22%. The Alpha band, as the main frequency band, the microstate feature set as model input to the four classifiers obtains an average classification accuracy of 98.61%, and the average classification accuracy obtained by the conventional EEG feature set as model is 91.19%. Based on four different classifiers, microstate parameters can be served as markers to effectively classify the EEG of AD patients. The microstate feature set outperforms the conventional EEG feature set after excluding the effect of classifiers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.