ArticleClinical chemistry and laboratory medicine2025
The different serum albumin assays influence calcium status in haemodialysis patients: a comparative study against free calcium as a reference method.
Article in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAccurate assessment of calcium levels is crucial for optimal management of regular Haemodialysis (HD) patients. Different calcium adjustment equations and albumin methods; including bromocresol purple (BCP) and bromocresol green (BCG) assays are employed by laboratories, which cause considerable discrepancies between reported results. The aim of this study is to assess the influence of albumin assays on calcium status in stable haemodialysis patients against free calcium (fCa) as a gold standard test.
methodsA total of 103 paired serum and fCa samples were collected from a cohort of stable HD patients. Albumin levels were measured by either the BCP or BCG method, and samples were also analysed for the total calcium (T.Ca), phosphate, bicarbonate, and pH levels. The performance of BCG-based and BCP-based adjusted calcium equations was compared using Z-scores scatter plots, intraclass correlation coefficient and Cohen Kappa statistic, with fCa being the reference standard.
resultsUnadjusted T.Ca achieved a 70 % overall classification agreement with fCa and identified 61 % of the "true" hypocalcaemic samples. Adjusted calcium concentrations, calculated by either BCP- or BCG-based equation, were poor predictors of fCa; with more than 50 % of the hypocalcaemic samples being misclassified as normocalcaemic. Notably, both equations misclassified the calcium status in 5 (4.9 %) patients with severe hypocalcaemia (i.e., potentially requiring calcium infusion) as mild hypocalcaemia.
conclusionsOur study showed evidence of hidden hypocalcaemia being missed by the current practice of using adjusted calcium in HD patients. Therefore, we recommend abandoning the adjustment procedure in samples from stable HD patients in favour of fCa measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39668135What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.