ArticleEye (London, England)2025
Risk of audiologic side effects with teprotumumab treatment for thyroid eye disease: propensity matched analysis.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Orbital Radiotherapy for Thyroid-Associated Orbitopathy in the Era of Targeted Biologics: Reposition, Not Replace.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Association of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors With Otologic Symptoms: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- The role of monoclonal antibodies against IL-6 or IL-6R in the treatment of thyroid eye disease.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
- The Role of Thyroid Hormone Signaling in the Development and Pathophysiology of Hearing: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Teprotumumab and sensorineural hearing loss: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study.Endocrine connections · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesPatients with thyroid eye disease (TED) taking teprotumumab have reported audiologic symptoms as a side effect; however, limited real world data and large sample sizes have been utilized to evaluate this relationship.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was created in TriNetX to identify patients with TED utilizing ICD-10, CPT, and Healthcare Common Procedure coding systems. TED patients with and without teprotumumab treatment were analysed with greedy one-to-one propensity matching. Appearance of one or more new ICD-10 codes corresponding to audiologic outcomes of interest (tinnitus, sensorineural hearing loss, hypoacusis, hyperacusis, autophony, Eustachian tube dysfunction) served as the outcome of interest. Patients with a history of hearing impairment were also evaluated for worsening hearing loss after initiation of teprotumumab.
resultsWithin the entire TriNetX cohort, 88 out of 441 patients with a diagnosis code for TED treated with teprotumumab had new appearance of an audiologic outcome within TriNetX. After matching, the relative risk for TED patients who were exposed to teprotumumab for new audiologic symptoms was increased with a risk ratio (RR) of 2.85 [95% CI 1.94, 4.20] compared to TED patients not exposed to teprotumumab. Of 51 patients with a history of hearing impairment and TED, 14 had record of new audiologic testing after teprotumumab administration (RR = 1.90 [0.96, 3.78]) compared to unexposed patients.
conclusionsThis study affirms previous research stating that TED patients receiving teprotumumab are at an increased risk of new audiologic side effects when compared to TED patients not using teprotumumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.