ReviewDie Anaesthesiologie2025
[Environmental sustainability in intensive care medicine].
Review in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From carbon cost to climate care: Greening our intensive care units.World journal of critical care medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intensive care medicine is an area with a particularly high consumption of resources. This review presents important new findings relating to the environmental sustainability of intensive care medicine. For example, the drugs used in intensive care medicine can end up in the environment and cause relevant ecotoxicity. The consumption of material items is very high in intensive care medicine and the increasing replacement of reusable items by disposable items is a major problem. Simple measures can reduce the ecological footprint of materials and introduce the recycling of waste in intensive care units. The high energy consumption of air conditioning, lighting and medical technology varies between facilities but in most cases is substantial and can be significantly reduced through appropriate measures. Ideally, the consumption should be measured and analyzed in detail. In the future, support from artificial intelligence is conceivable in this aspect. Sustainability must be given a much higher priority in the training, continued and advanced education in intensive care medicine than it has been to date and in intensive care research sustainability aspects should be given equal consideration alongside economic aspects when it comes to assessing otherwise equivalent treatments. It is particularly important to avoid the misuse and overuse of intensive care. It brings no benefit to patients and hinders needs-based treatment that is oriented towards the patient's well-being. In addition, misuse and overuse increases costs and drives up the consumption of resources and thus the ecological footprint. Sustainability in the intensive care unit can only be achieved as a team. Various approaches are presented on how a networked Green Team can promote sustainability in the intensive care unit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39668229What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.