Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39668490›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA

Challenges in Therapeutically Targeting the RNA-Recognition Motif.

Stefan Schmeing, Peter 't Hart

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Paraspeckle Component 1: a multifunctional RNA binding protein.American journal of cancer research · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. TheFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stefan SchmeingChemical Genomics Centre of the Max Planck Society, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8202-8549
Peter 't HartChemical Genomics Centre of the Max Planck Society, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3488-4409

Funding

European Research Council 101076498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The RNA recognition motif (RRM) is the most common RNA binding domain found in the human proteome. RRM domains provide RNA-binding proteins with sequence specific RNA recognition allowing them to participate in RNA-centric processes such as mRNA maturation, translation initiation, splicing, and RNA degradation. They are drivers of various diseases through overexpression or mutation, making them attractive therapeutic targets and addressing these proteins through their RRM domains with chemical compounds is gaining ever more attention. However, it is still very challenging to find selective and potent RNA-competitors due to the small size of the domain and high structural conservation of its RNA binding interface. Despite these challenges, a selection of compounds has been reported for several RRM containing proteins, but often with limited biophysical evidence and low selectivity. A solution to selectively targeting RRM domains might be through avoiding the RNA-binding surface altogether, but rather look for composite pockets formed with other proteins or for protein-protein interaction sites that regulate the target's activity but are less conserved. Alternative modalities, such as oligonucleotides, peptides, and molecular glues, are exciting new approaches to address these challenging targets and achieve the goal of therapeutic intervention at the RNA regulatory level.

Indexed as

RNA Recognition MotifAnimalsHumansRNARNA-Binding ProteinsRNARNA-Binding ProteinsinhibitorsmRNA processingRNA‐binding proteinsRNA‐recognition motif

Identifiers

PMID39668490
PMCPMC11638515

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.